Literature DB >> 11439493

Variation of sensitometric curves of radiographic films in high energy photon beams.

C Danciu1, B S Proimos, J C Rosenwald, B J Mijnheer.   

Abstract

Film dosimetry is an important tool for the verification of irradiation techniques. The shape of the sensitometric curve depends on the type of film as well as on the irradiation and processing conditions. Existing data concerning the influence of irradiation geometry on the sensitometric curve are conflicting. In particular the variation of optical density, OD, with field size and depth in a phantom shows large differences in magnitude between various authors. This variation, as well as the effect of beam energy and film plane orientation on OD, was therefore investigated for two types of film, Kodak X-Omat V and Agfa Structurix D2. Films were positioned in a solid phantom, either perpendicular or (almost) parallel to the beam axis, and irradiated to different dose levels using various photon beams (Co-60, 6 MV, 15 MV, 18 MV, 45 MV). It was found that the sensitometric curves of the Kodak film derived at different depths are almost identical for the four x-ray beams. For the Kodak film the differences in OD with depth are less than 2%, except for the Co-60 beam, where the difference is about 4% at 10 cm depth for a 15 cm x 15 cm field. The slope of the sensitometric curve of the Agfa film is somewhat more dependent on photon beam energy, depth and field size. The sensitometric curves of both types of film are almost independent of the film plane orientation, except for shallow depths. For Co-60 and for the same dose, the Kodak and Agfa films gave at dose maximum an OD lower by 4% and 6%, respectively, for the parallel compared to the perpendicular geometry. Good dosimetric results can be obtained if films from the same batch are irradiated with small to moderate field sizes (up to about 15 cm x 15 cm), at moderate depths (up to about 15 cm), using a single calibration curve, e.g., for a 10 cm x 10 cm field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11439493     DOI: 10.1118/1.1376443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  A calibration method for patient specific IMRT QA using a single therapy verification film.

Authors:  Arvind Kumar Shukla; Arun S Oinam; Sanjeev Kumar; I S Sandhu; S C Sharma
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-05-24

2.  Dosimetric verification of inverse planned step and shoot multileaf collimator fields from a commercial treatment planning system.

Authors:  M A MacKenzie; M Lachaine; B Murray; B G Fallone; D Robinson; G C Field
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Analysis of variation in calibration curves for Kodak XV radiographic film using model-based parameters.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Ravi Kulasekere; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Accuracy of rapid radiographic film calibration for intensity-modulated radiation therapy verification.

Authors:  Ravi Kulasekere; Jean M Moran; Benedick A Fraass; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  The use of extended dose range film for dosimetric calibration of a scanning liquid-filled ionization chamber electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  Mohammad Mohammadi; Eva Bezak; Paul Reich
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Dosimetric comparison of extended dose range film with ionization measurements in water and lung equivalent heterogeneous media exposed to megavoltage photons.

Authors:  Paule M Charland; Indrin J Chetty; Shigeru Yokoyama; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.