Literature DB >> 11439229

Lessons learnt from the EUROSTAR registry on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

S R Vallabhaneni1, P L Harris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The EUROSTAR project is a multicentred database of the outcome of endovascular repair of infra-renal aortic aneurysms. To date 92 European centres of vascular surgery have contributed. The purpose of the article here is to review the medium term (up to 4 years) results of endovascular aneurysm repair as reported to Eurostar. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients intended for endovascular aneurysm repair were notified to the EUROSTAR Data Registry Centre before treatment in order to eliminate bias due to selective reporting. The following data was collected on all patients: (1) their demographic details and the anatomical characteristics of their aneurysms, (2) details of the endovascular device used, (3) procedural complications and the immediate outcome, (4) results of contrast enhanced CT imaging at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after operation and at yearly intervals thereafter, (5) all adverse events. Life table analysis was performed to determine the cumulative rates of: (1) death from all causes, (2) secondary intervention. Risk factors for rupture and late conversion were identified by regression analysis.
RESULTS: By July 2000, 2862 patients had been registered and their median duration of follow-up was 12 mo (range 0-72). Successful deployment was achieved in 2812 patients with a perioperative (30 day) mortality of 2.9%. In 2464 patients enrolled by March 2000 late rupture of the aneurysm occurred in 14 patients for an annual cumulative rate of 1%. The significant factors were proximal type I endoleak (P=0.001), midgraft (type III) endoleak (P=0.001), graft migration (P=0.001) and post-operative kinking of the endograft (P=0.001). Forty-one patients had late conversion to open repair for an annual cumulative rate (risk) of approximately 2.1%. Risk factors (indications) for late conversion were: proximal type I endoleak (P=0.001), midgraft (type III) endoleak (P=0.001), type II endoleak (P=0.003), graft migration (P=0.001), graft kinking (P=0.001) and distal type I endoleak (P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of infra-renal aortic aneurysms using the first and second-generation devices that predominated in this study was associated with a risk of late failure of 3% per year, based upon an analysis of observed primary endpoints of rupture and conversion. Eurostar continues to provide responsible evaluation of the technique for the benefit of both physicians and the industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11439229     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(01)00340-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology and epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Ian M Nordon; Robert J Hinchliffe; Ian M Loftus; Matt M Thompson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Surveillance Imaging Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Nirnimesh Pandey; Harold I Litt
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Developing appropriate methodology for the study of surgical techniques.

Authors:  Peter McCulloch
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Matt M. Thompson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2003-04

Review 5.  Systematic review of tonsil surgery quality registers and introduction of the Nordic Tonsil Surgery Register Collaboration.

Authors:  Johanna Ruohoalho; Eirik Østvoll; Mette Bratt; Vegard Bugten; Leif Bäck; Antti Mäkitie; Therese Ovesen; Joacim Stalfors
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Ultrasonography for endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Maria Laura Luchetta; Rita De Florio; Francesco Cozzolino; Giovanni Casazza; Piergiorgio Duca; Basso Parente; Massimiliano Orso; Antonella Germani; Paolo Eusebi; Alessandro Montedori
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-09

7.  Treatment of complications following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  William Grande; S William Stavropoulos
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Type II endoleak with or without intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair does not change aneurysm-related outcomes despite sac growth.

Authors:  Joy Walker; Lue-Yen Tucker; Philip Goodney; Leah Candell; Hong Hua; Steven Okuhn; Bradley Hill; Robert W Chang
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Authors:  Andrew England; Richard Mc Williams
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2013-01

10.  Predictors of adverse events after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A meta-analysis of case reports.

Authors:  Felix Jv Schlösser; Geert Jmg van der Heijden; Yolanda van der Graaf; Frans L Moll; Hence Jm Verhagen
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2008-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.