Literature DB >> 29589140

Systematic review of tonsil surgery quality registers and introduction of the Nordic Tonsil Surgery Register Collaboration.

Johanna Ruohoalho1, Eirik Østvoll2,3, Mette Bratt4, Vegard Bugten4,5, Leif Bäck6, Antti Mäkitie6, Therese Ovesen7, Joacim Stalfors3,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgical quality registers provide tools to measure and improve the outcome of surgery. International register collaboration creates an opportunity to assess and critically evaluate national practices, and increases the size of available datasets. Even though millions of yearly tonsillectomies and tonsillotomies are performed worldwide, clinical practices are variable and inconsistency of evidence regarding the best clinical practice exists. The need for quality improvement actions is evident. We aimed to systematically investigate the existing tonsil surgery quality registers found in the literature, and to provide a thorough presentation of the planned Nordic Tonsil Surgery Register Collaboration.
METHODS: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (from January 1990 to December 2016) was conducted to identify registers, databases, quality improvement programs or comprehensive audit programs addressing tonsil surgery.
RESULTS: We identified two active registers and three completed audit programs focusing on tonsil surgery quality registration. Recorded variables were fairly similar, but considerable variation in coverage, number of operations included and length of time period for inclusion was discovered.
CONCLUSION: Considering tonsillectomies and tonsillotomies being among the most commonly performed surgical procedures in otorhinolaryngology, it is surprising that only two active registers could be identified. We present a Nordic Tonsil Surgery Register Collaboration-an international tonsil surgery quality register project aiming to provide accurate benchmarks and enhance the quality of tonsil surgery in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.

Keywords:  Database; Quality assurance; Registry; Surgical quality; Tonsillectomy; Tonsillotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29589140     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-4945-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  39 in total

1.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The pros and cons of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Peter Croft; Antti Malmivaara; Maurits van Tulder
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Real-effectiveness medicine--pursuing the best effectiveness in the ordinary care of patients.

Authors:  Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.709

4.  Mortality after tonsil surgery, a population study, covering eight years and 82,527 operations in Sweden.

Authors:  Eirik Østvoll; Ola Sunnergren; Elisabeth Ericsson; Claes Hemlin; Elisabeth Hultcrantz; Erik Odhagen; Joacim Stalfors
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Dissection versus diathermy for tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Darren K Pinder; Helena Wilson; Malcolm P Hilton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-03-16

Review 6.  Perioperative local anaesthesia for reducing pain following tonsillectomy.

Authors:  L J Hollis; M J Burton; J M Millar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

7.  Tonsil surgery efficiently relieves symptoms: analysis of 54 696 patients in the National Tonsil Surgery Register in Sweden.

Authors:  Joacim Stalfors; Elisabeth Ericsson; Claes Hemlin; Elisabeth Hultcrantz; Ingemar Månsson; Kristian Roos; Anne-Charlotte Hessén Söderman
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 8.  Swedish guidelines for the treatment of pain in tonsil surgery in pediatric patients up to 18 years.

Authors:  E Ericsson; M Brattwall; S Lundeberg
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Impact of NICE guidance on rates of haemorrhage after tonsillectomy: an evaluation of guidance issued during an ongoing national tonsillectomy audit.

Authors:  National Prospective Tonsillectomy Audit
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2008-08

10.  External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register.

Authors:  Jonas F Ludvigsson; Eva Andersson; Anders Ekbom; Maria Feychting; Jeong-Lim Kim; Christina Reuterwall; Mona Heurgren; Petra Otterblad Olausson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical practice of tonsil surgery from quality register data from Sweden and Norway and one clinic in Denmark.

Authors:  Joacim Stalfors; Therese Ovesen; Jannik Buus Bertelsen; Vegard Bugten; Siri Wennberg; Ola Sunnergren
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Tonsillectomy versus tonsillotomy for obstructive sleep-disordered breathing in children.

Authors:  Helen Blackshaw; Laurie R Springford; Lai-Ying Zhang; Betty Wang; Roderick P Venekamp; Anne Gm Schilder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-29

3.  Providing quality data in health care - almost perfect inter-rater agreement in the Norwegian tonsil surgery register.

Authors:  Siri Wennberg; Lasse A Karlsen; Joacim Stalfors; Mette Bratt; Vegard Bugten
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Paediatric Posttonsillectomy Haemorrhage Rates in Auckland: A Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Andrés Alvo; Andrew Hall; James Johnston; Murali Mahadevan
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.