Literature DB >> 11439213

Pre-treatment dosimetric verification by means of a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device during dynamic delivery of intensity modulated treatment fields.

A Van Esch1, B Vanstraelen, J Verstraete, G Kutcher, D Huyskens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Although intensity modulated radiation therapy is characterized by three-dimensional dose distributions which are often superior to those obtained with conventional treatment plans, its routine clinical implementation is partially held back by the complexity of the beam verification. This is even more so when a dynamic multileaf collimator (dMLC) is used instead of a segmented beam delivery. We have therefore investigated the possibility of using a commercially available, liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for the pre-treatment quality assurance of dynamically delivered dose distributions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A special acquisition mode was developed to optimize the image acquisition speed for dosimetry with the liquid-filled EPID. We investigated the accuracy of this mode for 6 and 18 MV photon beams through comparison with film and ion chamber measurements. The impact of leaf speed and pulse rate fluctuations was quantified by means of dMLC plans especially designed for this purpose. Other factors influencing the accuracy of the dosimetry (e.g. the need for build-up, remanence of the ion concentration in the liquid and bulging of the liquid at non-zero gantry angles) were studied as well. We finally compared dosimetric EPID images with the corresponding image prediction delivered without a patient in the beam.
RESULTS: The dosimetric accuracy of the measured dose distribution is approximately 2% with respect to film and ion chamber measurements. The accuracy declines when leaf speed is increased beyond 2 cm/s, but is fairly insensitive to accelerator pulse rate fluctuations. The memory effect is found to be of no clinical relevance. When comparing the acquired and expected distributions, an overall agreement of 3% can be obtained, except at areas of steep dose gradients where slight positional shifts are translated into large errors.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate dosimetric images of intensity modulated beam profiles delivered with a dMLC can be obtained with a commercially available, liquid-filled EPID. The developed acquisition mode is especially suited for fast and accurate pre-treatment verification of the intensity modulated fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11439213     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00305-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  9 in total

1.  A generalized calibration procedure for in vivo transit dosimetry using siemens electronic portal imaging devices.

Authors:  Andrea Fidanzio; Francesca Greco; Laura Gargiulo; Savino Cilla; Domenico Sabatino; Massimo Cappiello; Cinzia Di Felice; Elisabetta Di Castro; Luigi Azario; Mariateresa Russo; Luciano Pompei; Guido D'Onofrio; Angelo Piermattei
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Commissioning and Evaluation of an Electronic Portal Imaging Device-Based In-Vivo Dosimetry Software.

Authors:  Mareike Held; Joey Cheung; Angelica Perez Andujar; François Husson; Olivier Morin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-02-02

3.  Implementation and validation of a commercial portal dosimetry software for intensity-modulated radiation therapy pre-treatment verification.

Authors:  C Varatharaj; Eugenia Moretti; M Ravikumar; Maria Rosa Malisan; Sanjay S Supe; Renato Padovani
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-10

4.  Eight years of IMRT quality assurance with ionization chambers and film dosimetry: experience of the Montpellier Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Pascal Fenoglietto; Benoit Laliberté; Norbert Aillères; Olivier Riou; Jean-Bernard Dubois; David Azria
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Feasibility study on the verification of actual beam delivery in a treatment room using EPID transit dosimetry.

Authors:  Tae Seong Baek; Eun Ji Chung; Jaeman Son; Myonggeun Yoon
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  A quality assurance phantom for electronic portal imaging devices.

Authors:  Indra J Das; Minsong Cao; Chee-Wai Cheng; Vladimir Misic; Klaus Scheuring; Edmund Schüle; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Feasibility of using two-dimensional array dosimeter for in vivo dose reconstruction via transit dosimetry.

Authors:  Heeteak Chung; Jonathan Li; Sanjiv Samant
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  The use of extended dose range film for dosimetric calibration of a scanning liquid-filled ionization chamber electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  Mohammad Mohammadi; Eva Bezak; Paul Reich
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Comparison of measured and computed portal dose for IMRT treatment.

Authors:  Savino Cilla; Pietro Viola; Luigi Azario; Luca Grimaldi; Maurizio Craus; Guido D'Onofrio; Andrea Fidanzio; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Angelo Piermattei
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.