BACKGROUND: Learning preference refers to how individuals choose to approach learning situations. Computer-aided instruction (CAI) permits the adaptation of educational content to individual student learning strategies. METHODS: To determine if learning preference and computer attitude influence the acquisition of knowledge using CAI materials, a prototype CAI program was developed that incorporated differing learning exercises. Students (n = 180) completed Rezler's Learning Preference Inventory (LPI) and a computer attitude survey (CAS). The LPI uses three sets of paired scales to characterize learning preference and choice of learning situation. The CAS assesses student attitudes toward computers in general (CAS-G), as well as the educational use of computers (CAS-E). After finishing the program students completed a program attitude survey (CAS-P). Immediate comprehension was assessed by pretests and posttests incorporated into the program. Retention was assessed by a repeat of the posttest 4 to 6 weeks after initial program review. RESULTS: Scores (mean +/- SEM) on the pretest, posttest, and late posttest were 38.1% +/- 1.35%, 70.9% +/- 1.24%, and 62.5% +/- 1.44%, respectively. There was no correlation between students' learning preferences or computer attitude and test performance. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that CAI provides a means of delivering educational content that results in an increase in knowledge that is not correlated with computer attitudes or learning preferences.
BACKGROUND: Learning preference refers to how individuals choose to approach learning situations. Computer-aided instruction (CAI) permits the adaptation of educational content to individual student learning strategies. METHODS: To determine if learning preference and computer attitude influence the acquisition of knowledge using CAI materials, a prototype CAI program was developed that incorporated differing learning exercises. Students (n = 180) completed Rezler's Learning Preference Inventory (LPI) and a computer attitude survey (CAS). The LPI uses three sets of paired scales to characterize learning preference and choice of learning situation. The CAS assesses student attitudes toward computers in general (CAS-G), as well as the educational use of computers (CAS-E). After finishing the program students completed a program attitude survey (CAS-P). Immediate comprehension was assessed by pretests and posttests incorporated into the program. Retention was assessed by a repeat of the posttest 4 to 6 weeks after initial program review. RESULTS: Scores (mean +/- SEM) on the pretest, posttest, and late posttest were 38.1% +/- 1.35%, 70.9% +/- 1.24%, and 62.5% +/- 1.44%, respectively. There was no correlation between students' learning preferences or computer attitude and test performance. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that CAI provides a means of delivering educational content that results in an increase in knowledge that is not correlated with computer attitudes or learning preferences.
Authors: Mary Jo White; Beth M Ewy; Judith Ockene; Scott McIntosh; Jane Zapka; Catherine A Powers; Alan Geller Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: David Gerard Healy; Fergal J Fleming; David Gilhooley; Patrick Felle; Alfred Edward Wood; Thomas Gorey; Enda W McDermott; John M Fitzpatrick; Niall J O'Higgins; Arnold D K Hill Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2005-06-29 Impact factor: 2.463