Literature DB >> 11437964

Student feedback in problem based learning: a survey of 103 final year students across five Ontario medical schools.

A Parikh1, K McReelis, B Hodges.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Problem based learning (PBL) has become an integral component of medical curricula around the world. In Ontario, Canada, PBL has been implemented in all five Ontario medical schools for several years. Although proper and timely feedback is an essential component of medical education, the types of feedback that students receive in PBL have not been systematically investigated.
OBJECTIVES: In the first multischool study of PBL in Canada, we sought to determine the types of feedback (grades, written comments, group feedback from tutor, individual feedback from tutor, peer feedback, self-assessment, no feedback) that students receive as well as their satisfaction with these different feedback modalities. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We surveyed a sample of 103 final year medical students at the five Ontario schools (University of Toronto, McMaster University, Queens University, University of Ottawa and University of Western Ontario). Subjects were recruited via E-mail and were asked to fill out a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Many students felt that the most helpful type of feedback in PBL was individual feedback from the tutor, and indeed, individual feedback was one of the more common types of feedback provided. However, although students also indicated a strong preference for peer and group feedback, these forms of feedback were not widely reported. There were significant differences between schools in the use of grades, written comments, self-assessment and peer feedback, as well as the immediacy of the feedback given.
CONCLUSIONS: Across Ontario, students do receive frequent feedback in PBL. However, significant differences exist in the types of feedback students receive, as well as the timing. Although rated highly by students at all schools, the use of peer feedback and self-assessment is limited at most, but not all, medical schools.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11437964     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00994.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  6 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary simulation education for undergraduate paramedic students.

Authors:  M Boyle; B Williams; S Burgess
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Multiple rubric-based assessments of student case presentations.

Authors:  Catherine E O'Brien; Amy M Franks; Cindy D Stowe
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Evaluation of Problem-Based Learning implementation in a College of Medicine, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a cross sectional comparative study.

Authors:  Manahel A Almulhem; Jwaher A Almulhem
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.263

Review 4.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anli Yue Zhou; Paul Baker
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-08-13

5.  The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Lerchenfeldt; Misa Mi; Marty Eng
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Self- and peer assessment may not be an accurate measure of PBL tutorial process.

Authors:  José Lúcio Martins Machado; Valéria Menezes Peixeiro Machado; Waldir Grec; Valdes Roberto Bollela; Joaquim Edson Vieira
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.