Literature DB >> 11436741

Facilitative and inhibitory effects of cuing sound duration, intensity, and timbre.

T A Mondor1, T E Lacey.   

Abstract

Two experiments are reported in which the possibility that auditory attention may be controlled in a stimulus-driven manner by duration, intensity, and timbre cues was examined. In both experiments, listeners were presented with a cue followed, after a variable time period of a 150-, 450-, or 750-msec stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), by a target. In three different conditions for each experiment, the duration, intensity, or timbre relation between the cue and the target was varied so that, on 50% of the trials, the two sounds were identical and, on 50% of the trials, the two sounds were different in the manipulated feature. The two experiments differed only in the judgment required, with listeners in Experiment 1 identifying the duration, intensity, or timbre of the target and listeners in Experiment 2 indicating whether the target incorporated a brief silent gap. In both experiments, performance was observed to depend on both the similarity of and the time between the cue and the target. Specifically, whereas at the 150-msec SOA performance was best when the target was identical to the preceding cue, at the 750-msec SOA performance was best when the cue and the target differed. This pattern establishes the existence of duration-, intensity-, and timbre-based auditory inhibition of return. The theoretical implications of these results are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11436741     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  7 in total

1.  Enhancement, extension, and reversal of the frequency selectivity effect.

Authors:  Todd A Mondor; Jennifer Hurlburt; Lisa Gammell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

2.  Semantic inhibition of return is the exception rather than the rule.

Authors:  Ulrich W Weger; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

Review 3.  Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response.

Authors:  Kristie R Dukewich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

4.  Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing.

Authors:  Lori B Astheimer; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Auditory attention to frequency and time: an analogy to visual local-global stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy Justus; Alexandra List
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-01-06

6.  Eliminating inhibition of return by changing salient nonspatial attributes in a complex environment.

Authors:  Frank K Hu; Arthur G Samuel; Agnes S Chan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-02

7.  Interaction between location- and frequency-based inhibition of return in human auditory system.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Ming Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 2.064

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.