Literature DB >> 11435940

Counter-stimulatory effects on pain perception and processing are significantly altered by attention: an fMRI study.

S E Longe1, R Wise, S Bantick, D Lloyd, H Johansen-Berg, F McGlone, I Tracey.   

Abstract

Counter-stimulation reduces pain perception; however, the role of attention during this process is rarely discussed despite attention itself being a well known modulator of pain perception. This study investigated the effect of attentional modulation on pain perception during counter-stimulation using fMRI. Subjects received a noxious thermal stimulus together with an innocuous vibratory counter-stimulus. Subjects directed their attention towards either pain, vibration, or a neutral visual stimulus. During painful and counter-stimulation all subjects reported a reduction in pain perception when attending to counter-stimulation compared with attending to pain. Imaging data supported this behavioural finding showing reduced activity in pain processing areas (anterior cingulate, insula, thalamus). These results suggest attention plays an important part in the pain relief experienced from counter-stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11435940     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200107030-00047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  24 in total

Review 1.  Importance of anti- and pro-nociceptive mechanisms in human disease.

Authors:  I Tracey; P Dunckley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  From nociception to pain perception: imaging the spinal and supraspinal pathways.

Authors:  Jonathan Brooks; Irene Tracey
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  EEG analysis reveals widespread directed functional interactions related to a painful cutaneous laser stimulus.

Authors:  T Markman; C C Liu; J H Chien; N E Crone; J Zhang; F A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Pain imaging in health and disease--how far have we come?

Authors:  Petra Schweinhardt; M Catherine Bushnell
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  The use of functional neuroimaging to evaluate psychological and other non-pharmacological treatments for clinical pain.

Authors:  Karin B Jensen; Chantal Berna; Marco L Loggia; Ajay D Wasan; Robert R Edwards; Randy L Gollub
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Oscillatory EEG activity induced by conditioning stimuli during fear conditioning reflects Salience and Valence of these stimuli more than Expectancy.

Authors:  J H Chien; L Colloca; A Korzeniewska; J J Cheng; C M Campbell; A E Hillis; F A Lenz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Painful cutaneous laser stimuli induce event-related oscillatory EEG activities that are different from those induced by nonpainful electrical stimuli.

Authors:  J H Chien; C C Liu; J H Kim; T M Markman; F A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Differential effects on pain intensity and unpleasantness of two meditation practices.

Authors:  David M Perlman; Tim V Salomons; Richard J Davidson; Antoine Lutz
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-02

Review 9.  Cognitive and emotional control of pain and its disruption in chronic pain.

Authors:  M Catherine Bushnell; Marta Ceko; Lucie A Low
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Central processing of noxious somatic stimuli in patients with irritable bowel syndrome compared with healthy controls.

Authors:  Steve Heymen; William Maixner; William E Whitehead; Rebecca R Klatzkin; Beth Mechlin; Kathleen C Light
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.