Literature DB >> 11434214

Reduction potential of microbial, odour and ammonia emissions from a pig facility by biofilters.

W Martens1, M Martinec, R Zapirain, M Stark, E Hartung, U Palmgren.   

Abstract

The intention of this study was the determination of the potential to reduce specific microbial bioaerosol (cultivable bacteria and fungi, total cell counts of microbes, airborne endotoxins and microbial volatile organic compounds, MVOC), odour and ammonia emissions from a pig facility by biofilters. Five identical biofilter units in half technical scale were filled with different filter materials (Biochips, coconut-peat, wood-bark, pellets + bark and compost) and connected in parallel to a piggery. The results showed obvious differences between the filter materials. Numbers of airborne cultivable bacteria were decreased by ca. 70 to 95% and the total counts of bacterial cells from ca. 25 to (>) 90%. The total amount of fungal cells was reduced by at least 60%, although the percentage of cultivable moulds in the air after passing the filters was sometimes higher than before. Airborne endotoxins and MVOC were effectively reduced by all filter materials to at least 90%. Regarding odour, the average reduction was between 40 and 83%, whereas only one of the filters proved to be capable of slightly reducing the ammonia emissions. No relationships between odour/ammonia and microbial bioaerosols with regard to the reduction efficiency of the different filter materials or the total load of the emitted air could be established. A tendency could be shown, that biofilters best capable to reduce odour emitted slightly more airborne bacteria, both cultivable and total cell counts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11434214     DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639-00035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  9 in total

1.  Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies.

Authors:  Vanessa Szott; Anika Friese
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Longitudinal study of the contamination of air and of soil surfaces in the vicinity of pig barns by livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jochen Schulz; Anika Friese; Sylvia Klees; Bernd A Tenhagen; Alexandra Fetsch; Uwe Rösler; Jörg Hartung
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  The Use of Bioaerosol Sampling for Airborne Virus Surveillance in Swine Production Facilities: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Benjamin D Anderson; John A Lednicky; Montserrat Torremorell; Gregory C Gray
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-07-27

4.  Investigation of Removal Capacities of Biofilters for Airborne Viable Micro-Organisms.

Authors:  Rémi Soret; Jean-Louis Fanlo; Luc Malhautier; Philippe Geiger; Sandrine Bayle
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The investigation of combined ventilation-biofilter systems using recycled treated wastewater on odor reduction efficiency.

Authors:  Andi Febrisiantosa; Hong L Choi; Anriansyah Renggaman; Sartika I A Sudiarto; Joonhee Lee
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Heating performance of a laboratory pilot-plant combining heat exchanger and air scrubber for animal houses.

Authors:  Manuel S Krommweh; Wolfgang Büscher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  In vitro assessment of probiotic potential of selected bacteria isolated from pig faeces with potential application of odour reduction.

Authors:  M Jahangir Alam; Mahfuzul Islam; Che-Ok Jeon; Ki-Choon Lee; Seon-Ho Kim; Chul-Ju Yang; M Enayet Kabir; Sang-Suk Lee
Journal:  Int J Vet Sci Med       Date:  2021-07-02

8.  Simultaneous removal of bioaerosols, odors and volatile organic compounds from a wastewater treatment plant by a full-scale integrated reactor.

Authors:  Jianwei Liu; Xinyue Kang; Xueli Liu; Peng Yue; Jianbin Sun; Chen Lu
Journal:  Process Saf Environ Prot       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 6.158

9.  A short review of bioaerosol emissions from gas bioreactors: Health threats, influencing factors and control technologies.

Authors:  Xu-Rui Hu; Meng-Fei Han; Can Wang; Nan-Yang Yang; Yong-Chao Wang; Er-Hong Duan; Hsing-Cheng Hsi; Ji-Guang Deng
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 7.086

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.