Literature DB >> 11432212

Patients' perceptions and responses to procedural pain: results from Thunder Project II.

K A Puntillo1, C White, A B Morris, S T Perdue, J Stanik-Hutt, C L Thompson, L R Wild.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the painfulness of procedures commonly performed in acute and critical care settings.
OBJECTIVE: To describe pain associated with turning, wound drain removal, tracheal suctioning, femoral catheter removal, placement of a central venous catheter, and nonburn wound dressing change and frequency of use of analgesics during procedures.
METHODS: A comparative, descriptive design was used. Numeric rating scales were used to measure pain intensity and procedural distress; word lists, to measure pain quality.
RESULTS: Data were obtained from 6201 patients: 176 younger than 18 years and 5957 adults. Mean pain intensity scores for turning and tracheal suctioning were 2.80 and 3.00, respectively (scale, 0-5), for 4- to 7-year-olds and 52.0 and 28.1 (scale, 0-100) for 8- to 12-year-olds. For adolescents, mean pain intensity scores for wound dressing change, turning, tracheal suctioning, and wound drain removal were 5 to 7 (scale, 0-10); mean procedural distress scores were 4.83 to 6.00 (scale, 0-10). In adults, mean pain intensity scores for all procedures were 2.65 to 4.93 (scale, 0-10); mean procedural distress scores were 1.89 to 3.47 (scale, 0-10). The most painful and distressing procedures were turning for adults and wound care for adolescents. Procedural pain was often described as sharp, stinging, stabbing, shooting, and awful. Less than 20% of patients received opiates before procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Procedural pain varies considerably and is procedure specific. Because procedures are performed so often, more individualized attention to preparation for and control of procedural pain is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11432212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  53 in total

1.  Facial expression as an indicator of pain in critically ill intubated adults during endotracheal suctioning.

Authors:  Mamoona Arif Rahu; Mary Jo Grap; Jeffrey F Cohn; Cindy L Munro; Debra E Lyon; Curtis N Sessler
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 2.  Facial expression and pain in the critically ill non-communicative patient: state of science review.

Authors:  Mamoona Arif-Rahu; Mary Jo Grap
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.072

Review 3.  [Sedation and analgesia in intensive care: physiology and application].

Authors:  David M Baron; Philipp G H Metnitz; Burkhard Gustorff
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 4.  [Palliative care : Challenges in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  H Lemm; J Hoeger-Schäfer; M Buerke
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  Discomfort associated with underhumidified high-flow oxygen therapy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Gerald Chanques; Jean-Michel Constantin; Magali Sauter; Boris Jung; Mustapha Sebbane; Daniel Verzilli; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Samir Jaber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Effect of a water-based no-sting, protective barrier formulation and a solvent-containing similar formulation on skin protection from medical adhesive trauma.

Authors:  Ronald J Shannon; Debashish Chakravarthy
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Responses to noxious stimuli in sedated mechanically ventilated adults.

Authors:  Mary Jo Grap; Cindy L Munro; Paul A Wetzel; Jessica M Ketchum; V Anne Hamilton; Curtis N Sessler
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.210

8.  The Val158Met polymorphism of the COMT gene is associated with increased pain sensitivity in morphine-treated patients undergoing a painful procedure after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Sabine J G M Ahlers; Laure L Elens; Laura van Gulik; Ron H van Schaik; Eric P A van Dongen; Peter Bruins; Dick Tibboel; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Predictors and use of nonpharmacologic interventions for procedural pain associated with turning among hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Bonnie Faigeles; Jill Howie-Esquivel; Christine Miaskowski; Julie Stanik-Hutt; Carol Thompson; Cheri White; Lorie Rietman Wild; Kathleen Puntillo
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 1.929

10.  Are joint and soft tissue injections painful? Results of a national French cross-sectional study of procedural pain in rheumatological practice.

Authors:  Serge Perrot; Françoise Laroche; Coralie Poncet; Pierre Marie; Catherine Payen-Champenois
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.