OBJECTIVE: To validate the Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Bispectral Index (BIS) in adult ICU patients after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective study comparing blinded evaluations of the SAS, VAS and BIS. SETTING: Forty-two-bed multidisciplinary ICU. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 39 adults after cardiac surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Bispectral Index 3.2 was continuously recorded using the Aspect A-1000 and evaluators were blinded to this value. The bedside nurse and a trained researcher independently rated wakefulness using a 100 mm VAS upon patient arrival on the ICU, at first awakening, when ventilator weaning was started and after extubation; the researcher also evaluated patients using SAS. Upon arrival on the ICU, the median SAS score was 2 (interquartile range = 1-3), the mean VAS was 26+/-30 and the mean BIS was 70+/-16. Twenty-four patients underwent a trial of weaning from mechanical ventilation with a SAS of 4 (IQR = 4), VAS of 86+/-12 and BIS of 87+/-10. SAS correlated well with VAS performed by one researcher (r = 0.91, p < 0.001) or by 19 different bedside nurses (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) and with BIS 3.2 (r = 0.60, p < 0.001). The correlation between SAS and BIS was reduced in patients with above average electromyogram (EMG) power. As a measure of construct validity, significant differences were noted for the BIS, SAS, VAS and EMG between ICU arrival and extubation (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sedation-Agitation Scale and BIS are valid measures of wakefulness after cardiac surgery, but EMG interference may affect the accuracy of BIS for a small percentage of patients not receiving neuromuscular blockade.
OBJECTIVE: To validate the Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Bispectral Index (BIS) in adult ICU patients after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective study comparing blinded evaluations of the SAS, VAS and BIS. SETTING: Forty-two-bed multidisciplinary ICU. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 39 adults after cardiac surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Bispectral Index 3.2 was continuously recorded using the Aspect A-1000 and evaluators were blinded to this value. The bedside nurse and a trained researcher independently rated wakefulness using a 100 mm VAS upon patient arrival on the ICU, at first awakening, when ventilator weaning was started and after extubation; the researcher also evaluated patients using SAS. Upon arrival on the ICU, the median SAS score was 2 (interquartile range = 1-3), the mean VAS was 26+/-30 and the mean BIS was 70+/-16. Twenty-four patients underwent a trial of weaning from mechanical ventilation with a SAS of 4 (IQR = 4), VAS of 86+/-12 and BIS of 87+/-10. SAS correlated well with VAS performed by one researcher (r = 0.91, p < 0.001) or by 19 different bedside nurses (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) and with BIS 3.2 (r = 0.60, p < 0.001). The correlation between SAS and BIS was reduced in patients with above average electromyogram (EMG) power. As a measure of construct validity, significant differences were noted for the BIS, SAS, VAS and EMG between ICU arrival and extubation (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sedation-Agitation Scale and BIS are valid measures of wakefulness after cardiac surgery, but EMG interference may affect the accuracy of BIS for a small percentage of patients not receiving neuromuscular blockade.
Authors: Michael J Banner; Neil R Euliano; A Daniel Martin; Nawar Al-Rawas; A Joseph Layon; Andrea Gabrielli Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Babar A Khan; Oscar Guzman; Noll L Campbell; Todd Walroth; Jason L Tricker; Siu L Hui; Anthony Perkins; Mohammed Zawahiri; John D Buckley; Mark O Farber; E Wesley Ely; Malaz A Boustani Journal: Chest Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Carmen Hernández-Gancedo; David Pestaña; Hanna Pérez-Chrzanowska; Elena Martinez-Casanova; Antonio Criado Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2007-08-16 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Gerhard Schneider; Susanne Heglmeier; Jürgen Schneider; Gunter Tempel; Eberhard F Kochs Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-12-12 Impact factor: 17.440