Literature DB >> 11430243

Visually induced reorientation illusions.

I P Howard1, G Hu.   

Abstract

It is known that rotation of a furnished room around the roll axis of erect subjects produces an illusion of 360 degrees self-rotation in many subjects. Exposure of erect subjects to stationary tilted visual frames or rooms produces only up to 20 degrees of illusory tilt. But, in studies using static tilted rooms, subjects remained erect and the body axis was not aligned with the room. We have revealed a new class of disorientation illusions that occur in many subjects when placed in a 90 degrees or 180 degrees tilted room containing polarised objects (familiar objects with tops and bottoms). For example, supine subjects looking up at a wall of the room feel upright in an upright room and their arms feel weightless when held out from the body. We call this the levitation illusion. We measured the incidence of 90 degrees or 180 degrees reorientation illusions in erect, supine, recumbent, and inverted subjects in a room tilted 90 degrees or 180 degrees. We report that reorientation illusions depend on the displacement of the visual scene rather than of the body. However, illusions are most likely to occur when the visual and body axes are congruent. When the axes are congruent, illusions are least likely to occur when subjects are prone rather than supine, recumbent, or inverted.

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11430243     DOI: 10.1068/p3106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  15 in total

1.  The role of contextual cues in the haptic perception of orientations and the oblique effect.

Authors:  Marion Luyat; Christine Moroni; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

Review 2.  Self and world: large scale installations at science museums.

Authors:  Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

Review 3.  Head direction cell firing properties and behavioural performance in 3-D space.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Computation of egomotion in the macaque cerebellar vermis.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Tatyana A Yakusheva; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman; Pablo M Blazquez
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 5.  How vestibular neurons solve the tilt/translation ambiguity. Comparison of brainstem, cerebellum, and thalamus.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Tatyana A Yakusheva
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  The effect of visuo-haptic congruency on haptic spatial matching.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke I van Mier; Johan Lataster; Mirella Fingal; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Roll aftereffects: influence of tilt and inter-stimulus interval.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Perception of longitudinal body axis in patients with stroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  J Barra; V Chauvineau; T Ohlmann; M Gresty; D Pérennou
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 9.  How our body influences our perception of the world.

Authors:  Laurence R Harris; Michael J Carnevale; Sarah D'Amour; Lindsey E Fraser; Vanessa Harrar; Adria E N Hoover; Charles Mander; Lisa M Pritchett
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-12

10.  A rehabilitation tool for functional balance using altered gravity and virtual reality.

Authors:  Lars I E Oddsson; Robin Karlsson; Janusz Konrad; Serdar Ince; Steve R Williams; Erika Zemkova
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.