Literature DB >> 11430242

Visual discomfort: the influence of spatial frequency.

E Conlon1, W Lovegrove, S Barker, E Chekaluk.   

Abstract

The response of different visual discomfort groups to a range of spatial frequencies at threshold and suprathreshold was investigated. In experiment 1, a paired-comparison task was conducted. The high visual discomfort group judged a spatial frequency of 4 cycles deg-1 as the most perceptually distorted and somatically unpleasant to view. The moderate and low visual discomfort groups judged 8 and 12 cycles deg-1 as more perceptually and somatically unpleasant to view than lower spatial frequencies. In experiment 2, the spatial contrast-sensitivity function (CSF) for the high visual discomfort group was depressed for spatial frequencies between 1 and 12 cycles deg-1 in comparison with the moderate and low visual discomfort groups. When these same spatial frequencies were modulated at 6 Hz, CSFs were the same for all groups. These results are discussed in relation to a failure of inhibition across spatial-frequency channels in the high visual discomfort group. This may be explained by a more generalised parvocellular system processing deficit. Possible similarities between some forms of migraine and visual discomfort are highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11430242     DOI: 10.1068/p2954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  11 in total

1.  Visual-stress-related cortical excitability as a prospective marker for symptoms of depression and anxiety in young people.

Authors:  Christy Lai-Ming Hui; Stephanie Ming-Yin Wong; Terrence Yat-To Yu; Terry Tak-Yee Lau; Olivia Choi; Samantha Tsang; Yi-Nam Suen; Bess Yin-Hung Lam; Corine Sau-Man Wong; Simon Sai-Yu Lui; Kai-Tai Chan; Michael Tak-Hing Wong; Gloria Hoi-Yan Wong; Sherry Kit-Wa Chan; Edwin Ho-Ming Lee; Wing-Chung Chang; Arnold Wilkins; Eric Yu-Hai Chen
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 5.760

2.  The effects of visual discomfort and chromaticity separation on neural processing during a visual task.

Authors:  Lisa C Lindquist; Gregory R McIntire; Sarah M Haigh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Susceptibility to pattern glare following stroke.

Authors:  Ian G Beasley; Leon N Davies
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Detection and discrimination of flicker contrast in migraine.

Authors:  Olivera Karanovic; Michel Thabet; Hugh R Wilson; Frances Wilkinson
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.292

5.  Lexical decisions in adults with low and high susceptibility to pattern-related visual stress: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  James M Gilchrist; Peter M Allen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-14

6.  Development of the Japanese version of the Visual Discomfort Scale.

Authors:  Shu Imaizumi; Shinichi Koyama; Yoshihiko Tanno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Atypical sensory sensitivity as a shared feature between synaesthesia and autism.

Authors:  Jamie Ward; Claire Hoadley; James E A Hughes; Paula Smith; Carrie Allison; Simon Baron-Cohen; Julia Simner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Differential Effects of Orientation and Spatial-Frequency Spectra on Visual Unpleasantness.

Authors:  Narumi Ogawa; Isamu Motoyoshi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-06-16

9.  What is the Link Between Mental Imagery and Sensory Sensitivity? Insights from Aphantasia.

Authors:  C J Dance; J Ward; J Simner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 10.  A systematic review of controlled trials on visual stress using Intuitive Overlays or the Intuitive Colorimeter.

Authors:  Bruce J W Evans; Peter M Allen
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.