Literature DB >> 33588291

The effects of visual discomfort and chromaticity separation on neural processing during a visual task.

Lisa C Lindquist1, Gregory R McIntire1, Sarah M Haigh2.   

Abstract

Visual stimuli that are uncomfortable to look at evoke a large neural response suggesting altered processing. While there is some evidence linking uncomfortable achromatic stimuli to impaired visual processing, the effect of uncomfortable chromatic patterns on visual cognition has yet to be explored. Large differences in chromaticity separation (e.g. red and blue) elicit visual discomfort, larger metabolic responses, larger visual evoked potentials, and greater alpha suppression compared to small chromaticity separations (e.g. pink and purple). We investigated the impact of stimuli that varied in their chromaticity separation (calculated in perceptual color space) on a visual task and their effect on neural responses across the cortex. Thirty participants completed a continuous pairs task (letters changed at 3 Hz) while grating patterns that differed in their chromaticity separation alternated with a grey screen at 5 Hz. The different temporal frequencies allowed for steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) to the two stimulus-types to be measured simultaneously using electroencephalography (EEG). A subset of participants rated the gratings on a 9-point scale of discomfort. We observed greater ratings of discomfort and increased power at 5 Hz with the larger chromaticity separations. The increase in 5 Hz power with greater chromaticity separation was evident across the cortex. However, there was no significant effect of chromaticity separation on power at 3 Hz, or on reaction times, and no consistent effect on behavioral accuracy. Despite eliciting heightened neural responses across the cortex, short term exposure to uncomfortable chromatic stimuli does not adversely impact visual task performance.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromaticity separation; Continuous pairs task; EEG; SSVEP; Visual discomfort

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33588291      PMCID: PMC7987861          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  44 in total

1.  Neuromagnetic responses to chromatic flicker: implications for photosensitivity.

Authors:  Katsumi Watanabe; Toshiaki Imada; Kenji Nihei; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  TV can be bad for your health.

Authors:  G F Harding
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Time course of the haemodynamic response to visual stimulation in migraine, measured using near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Louise V Coutts; Chris E Cooper; Clare E Elwell; Arnold J Wilkins
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.292

4.  Brain (Hyper)Excitability Revealed by Optimal Electrical Stimulation of GABAergic Interneurons.

Authors:  F Wendling; U Gerber; D Cosandier-Rimele; A Nica; J De Montigny; O Raineteau; S Kalitzin; F Lopes da Silva; P Benquet
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  The clarity and comfort of printed text.

Authors:  A J Wilkins; M I Nimmo-Smith
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Photic- and pattern-induced seizures: a review for the Epilepsy Foundation of America Working Group.

Authors:  Robert S Fisher; Graham Harding; Giuseppe Erba; Gregory L Barkley; Arnold Wilkins
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.864

7.  Cortical hyperexcitability in migraine and aversion to patterns.

Authors:  Sm Haigh; O Karanovic; F Wilkinson; Aj Wilkins
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 6.292

8.  Selectivity of human retinotopic visual cortex to S-cone-opponent, L/M-cone-opponent and achromatic stimulation.

Authors:  Kathy T Mullen; Serge O Dumoulin; Katie L McMahon; Greig I de Zubicaray; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Visual distortion provoked by a stimulus in migraine associated with hyperneuronal activity.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Thomas G Cooper; Banu Satana; David I Kaufman; Yue Cao
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.887

10.  Decoding and reconstructing color from responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Gijs Joost Brouwer; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  Visual Discomfort and Variations in Chromaticity in Art and Nature.

Authors:  Olivier Penacchio; Sarah M Haigh; Xortia Ross; Rebecca Ferguson; Arnold J Wilkins
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.