S G Gerberich1, R W Gibson, L R French, C M Renier, T Y Lee, W P Carr, J Shutske. 1. Regional Injury Prevention Research Center, Division of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA. gerbe001@umn.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this effort was to identify the incidence and consequences of both farming and non-farming related injuries and the potential risk factors for farming related injuries among children and youth, aged 0-19 years, who lived in farm households in a large region of the United States. METHODS: Data were collected from randomly selected farm households during 1990. Rates and rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for sociodemographic and exposure variables. Multivariate analyses were conducted, using a priori and backward stepwise logistic regression models. RESULTS: Within the population of 3,939 farm households and 13,144 persons, children and youth accounted for 33%. Injury rates for farming and non-farming sources, respectively, were 1,683 and 6,980 per 100,000 persons. Animals (40%) were the primary sources of the farming operation related injuries; sports/recreation sources (61%) were associated primarily with non-farming related injuries. Of the farming and non-farming operation related injury cases, 83% and 90%, respectively, required some type of health care; moreover, 17% and 24%, respectively, were restricted from regular activities for one month or more. Through multivariate analyses, important increased rate ratios were observed for operating a tractor, working with dairy cattle, and being male. Increased rate ratios for working with beef cattle, operating a harvester, and living on a farm where there were all terrain vehicles in use, and a decreased rate ratio for living on a farm where there were sheep, appeared suggestive. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the relevant rates, injury consequences, and potential risk factors identified, injuries to children and youth on farms represent a significant problem. Future analytic studies are essential to identify more specific risk factors that can serve as a basis for development of appropriate intervention efforts. Given the population at risk, and the opportunity for intervention in this unique occupational setting, many of these injuries may be readily amenable to prevention efforts.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this effort was to identify the incidence and consequences of both farming and non-farming related injuries and the potential risk factors for farming related injuries among children and youth, aged 0-19 years, who lived in farm households in a large region of the United States. METHODS: Data were collected from randomly selected farm households during 1990. Rates and rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for sociodemographic and exposure variables. Multivariate analyses were conducted, using a priori and backward stepwise logistic regression models. RESULTS: Within the population of 3,939 farm households and 13,144 persons, children and youth accounted for 33%. Injury rates for farming and non-farming sources, respectively, were 1,683 and 6,980 per 100,000 persons. Animals (40%) were the primary sources of the farming operation related injuries; sports/recreation sources (61%) were associated primarily with non-farming related injuries. Of the farming and non-farming operation related injury cases, 83% and 90%, respectively, required some type of health care; moreover, 17% and 24%, respectively, were restricted from regular activities for one month or more. Through multivariate analyses, important increased rate ratios were observed for operating a tractor, working with dairy cattle, and being male. Increased rate ratios for working with beef cattle, operating a harvester, and living on a farm where there were all terrain vehicles in use, and a decreased rate ratio for living on a farm where there were sheep, appeared suggestive. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the relevant rates, injury consequences, and potential risk factors identified, injuries to children and youth on farms represent a significant problem. Future analytic studies are essential to identify more specific risk factors that can serve as a basis for development of appropriate intervention efforts. Given the population at risk, and the opportunity for intervention in this unique occupational setting, many of these injuries may be readily amenable to prevention efforts.
Authors: P Gunderson; S Gerberich; R Gibson; S Adlis; P Carr; A Erdman; J Elkington; R French; J Melton; J True Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 1990 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: J R Wilkins; J Mac Crawford; Lorann Stallones; Kathleen M Koechlin; Lei Shen; John Hayes; Thomas L Bean Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-12-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jason C Gillette; Catherine A Stevermer; Ross H Miller; Stacey A Meardon; Charles V Schwab Journal: Ergonomics Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Navneet Kaur Baidwan; Marizen R Ramirez; Fred Gerr; Daniel Boonstra; Joseph E Cavanaugh; Carri Casteel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Navneet Kaur Baidwan; Susan G Gerberich; Hyun Kim; Andrew D Ryan; Timothy R Church; Benjamin Capistrant Journal: Inj Epidemiol Date: 2018-09-24