C E Pless1, I B Pless. 1. Department of Philosophy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the range of accuracy of parent recall for many different events when compared with pediatrician's records and to establish whether good recall is associated with the nature of the event, period of recall, or demographic characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN: A nonconcurrent, descriptive survey of previous events. SETTING: Two pediatric group practices in Montreal, Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-eight parents of children aged 1 to 13 years. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS/MAIN RESULTS: Parents' responses to a self-administered questionnaire were compared with information extracted from pediatricians' records. The health events studied included asthma, bronchitis, otitis media, accidents, hospitalizations, office visits, and birth weight. Most parents (73%) were able to recall birth weight within 50 g, and 85% reported a frequency of hospitalizations that agreed exactly with the record. For asthma, bronchitis, and otitis in the last year, the percentages with good agreement were 91%, 85%, and 51%, respectively, while for the same disorders during the child's lifetime, the corresponding figures were 87%, 74%, and 53%, respectively. Each parent's responses were classified according to overall quality of agreement; associations between agreement and respondent characteristics were investigated. Mothers responded more accurately than fathers, and parents of younger children also showed better recall. Other factors, eg, education and occupation, were not significantly correlated with recall. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with pediatricians' records, parent reports are generally acceptable for most research purposes and may be a better source for some health events such as accidents.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the range of accuracy of parent recall for many different events when compared with pediatrician's records and to establish whether good recall is associated with the nature of the event, period of recall, or demographic characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN: A nonconcurrent, descriptive survey of previous events. SETTING: Two pediatric group practices in Montreal, Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-eight parents of children aged 1 to 13 years. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS/MAIN RESULTS: Parents' responses to a self-administered questionnaire were compared with information extracted from pediatricians' records. The health events studied included asthma, bronchitis, otitis media, accidents, hospitalizations, office visits, and birth weight. Most parents (73%) were able to recall birth weight within 50 g, and 85% reported a frequency of hospitalizations that agreed exactly with the record. For asthma, bronchitis, and otitis in the last year, the percentages with good agreement were 91%, 85%, and 51%, respectively, while for the same disorders during the child's lifetime, the corresponding figures were 87%, 74%, and 53%, respectively. Each parent's responses were classified according to overall quality of agreement; associations between agreement and respondent characteristics were investigated. Mothers responded more accurately than fathers, and parents of younger children also showed better recall. Other factors, eg, education and occupation, were not significantly correlated with recall. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with pediatricians' records, parent reports are generally acceptable for most research purposes and may be a better source for some health events such as accidents.
Authors: Larry A Greenbaum; Alvaro Muñoz; Michael F Schneider; Frederick J Kaskel; David J Askenazi; Randall Jenkins; Hilary Hotchkiss; Marva Moxey-Mims; Susan L Furth; Bradley A Warady Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Florence T Bourgeois; Stephen C Porter; Clarissa Valim; Tiffany Jackson; E Francis Cook; Kenneth D Mandl Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2007-08-21 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Amy M Linabery; Erik B Erhardt; Rachel K Fonstad; Richard F Ambinder; Greta R Bunin; Julie A Ross; Logan G Spector; Seymour Grufferman Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Richard B Parad; Jonathan M Davis; Jessica Lo; Mark Thomas; Neil Marlow; Sandy Calvert; Janet L Peacock; Anne Greenough Journal: Neonatology Date: 2015-03-03 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Amy M Linabery; Wenchao Li; Michelle A Roesler; Logan G Spector; Alan S Gamis; Andrew F Olshan; Nyla A Heerema; Julie A Ross Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Amie E Hwang; Thomas M Mack; Ann S Hamilton; W James Gauderman; Leslie Bernstein; Myles G Cockburn; John Zadnick; Kristin A Rand; John L Hopper; Wendy Cozen Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 4.897