Literature DB >> 11428378

Management of major pancreatic duct injuries in children.

T G Canty1, D Weinman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The operative versus nonoperative management of major pancreatic ductal injuries in children remains controversial. The computed tomographic (CT) scan may not be accurate for determination of location and type of injury. We report our experience with ductal injury including the recent use of acute endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for definitive imaging, and an endoscopically placed stent as definitive treatment. This has not been reported in children.
METHODS: In review of 14,245 admissions to a regional pediatric trauma center over a 14-year period, 18 patients with major ductal injuries from blunt trauma were noted. Records were reviewed for mechanism of injury, method of diagnosis, management, and outcome.
RESULTS: There were 10 girls and 8 boys, ranging in age from 2 months to 13 years. The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle and bicycle crashes. Admission CT scan in 16 children was suggestive of injury in 11, and missed the injury in 5. Distal pancreatectomy was carried out in eight patients with distal duct injuries: one died of central nervous system injury. Nonoperative management in three proximal duct injuries suggested by initial CT scan and in three missed distal duct injuries resulted in pseudocyst formation in five survivors; one patient died of central nervous system injuries. Two children with minimal abdominal pain, normal initial serum amylase, and no initial imaging developed pseudocysts. Two of seven pseudocysts spontaneously resolved and five were treated by delayed cystogastrostomy. Two recent children with suggestive CT scans were definitively diagnosed by acute ERCP and treated by endoscopic stenting. Clinical and chemical improvement was rapid and complete and the stents were removed. Follow-up ERCP, CT scan, and serum amylase levels are normal 1 year after injury.
CONCLUSION: Pancreatic ductal injuries are rare in pediatric blunt trauma. CT scanning is suggestive but not accurate for the diagnosis of type and location of injury. Acute ERCP is safe and accurate in children, and may allow for definitive treatment of ductal injury by stenting in selected patients. If stenting is not possible, or fails, distal injuries are best treated by distal pancreatectomy; proximal injuries may be managed nonoperatively, allowing for the formation and uneventful drainage of a pseudocyst.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11428378     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200106000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  23 in total

Review 1.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Margherita Trinci; Claudia Lucia Piccolo; Riccardo Ferrari; Michele Galluzzo; Stefania Ianniello; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-12-08

2.  Blunt pancreatic duct injury in children.

Authors:  Hirotaka Yamamoto; Takanori Ochi; Eiji Miyazaki; Hiromichi Machida; Shigeo Tobayama; Kazufumi Suzuki
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2015-11-12

3.  Blunt pancreatic trauma in children.

Authors:  Baruch Klin; Ibrahim Abu-Kishk; Igor Jeroukhimov; Yigal Efrati; Eran Kozer; Efrat Broide; Yuri Brachman; Laurian Copel; Eitan Scapa; Gideon Eshel; Gad Lotan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Non-operative treatment versus percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in children.

Authors:  K W Russell; D C Barnhart; J Madden; E Leeflang; W D Jackson; G P Feola; R L Meyers; E R Scaife; M D Rollins
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Management and outcomes of peripancreatic fluid collections and pseudocysts following non-operative management of pancreatic injuries in children.

Authors:  Eric H Rosenfeld; Adam M Vogel; Mubeen Jafri; Randall Burd; Robert Russell; Marianne Beaudin; Alexis Sandler; Rajan Thakkar; Richard A Falcone; Hale Wills; Jeffrey Upperman; Rita V Burke; Mauricio A Escobar; Denise B Klinkner; Barbara A Gaines; Ankush Gosain; Brendan T Campbell; David Mooney; Anthony Stallion; Stephon J Fenton; Jose M Prince; David Juang; Nathaniel Kreykes; Bindi J Naik-Mathuria
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Non-operative management of a grade IV pancreatic injury.

Authors:  Bharati Hiremath; Nishchit Hegde
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-30

7.  Management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children: Review of the National Trauma Data Bank.

Authors:  Brian R Englum; Brian C Gulack; Henry E Rice; John E Scarborough; Obinna O Adibe
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Delayed presentation of complete pancreatic ductal transection in children: management of two cases without resection.

Authors:  Whalen Clark; Charles N Paidas; David Germain; Claude Guidi; Haim Pinkas; Mark L Kayton
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Computed tomography for pancreatic injuries in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Hamdi Hameed Almaramhy; Salman Yousuf Guraya
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-27

Review 10.  Management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children.

Authors:  Kosaku Maeda; Shigeru Ono; Katsuhisa Baba; Insu Kawahara
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.