R H Fagard1. 1. Hypertension and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Molecular and Cardiovascular Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium. robert.fagard@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of the characteristics of the exercise program, particularly exercise intensity, on the blood pressure response to dynamic physical training in otherwise healthy normotensive and hypertensive subjects. METHODS: This study is a meta-analysis of randomized controlled intervention trials and a description of studies in which different training regimens have been compared. RESULTS: The weighted net reduction of blood pressure in response to dynamic physical training averaged 3.4/2.4 mm Hg (P < 0.001). Interstudy differences in the changes in pressure were not related to weekly frequency, time per session, or exercise intensity, which ranged from approximately 45--85%; these three characteristics combined explained less than 5% of the variance of the blood pressure response. The response of diastolic blood pressure was not different according to training intensity in studies that randomized patients to training programs with different intensities. Some studies reported a greater reduction of systolic blood pressure when intensity was about 40% than when participants exercised at about 70%, but this finding was not consistent, neither within nor between studies. CONCLUSION: Training from three to five times per week during 30--60 min per session at an intensity of about 40--50% of net maximal exercise performance appears to be effective with regard to blood pressure reduction. The evidence that higher intensity exercise would be less effective is at present inconsistent.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of the characteristics of the exercise program, particularly exercise intensity, on the blood pressure response to dynamic physical training in otherwise healthy normotensive and hypertensive subjects. METHODS: This study is a meta-analysis of randomized controlled intervention trials and a description of studies in which different training regimens have been compared. RESULTS: The weighted net reduction of blood pressure in response to dynamic physical training averaged 3.4/2.4 mm Hg (P < 0.001). Interstudy differences in the changes in pressure were not related to weekly frequency, time per session, or exercise intensity, which ranged from approximately 45--85%; these three characteristics combined explained less than 5% of the variance of the blood pressure response. The response of diastolic blood pressure was not different according to training intensity in studies that randomized patients to training programs with different intensities. Some studies reported a greater reduction of systolic blood pressure when intensity was about 40% than when participants exercised at about 70%, but this finding was not consistent, neither within nor between studies. CONCLUSION: Training from three to five times per week during 30--60 min per session at an intensity of about 40--50% of net maximal exercise performance appears to be effective with regard to blood pressure reduction. The evidence that higher intensity exercise would be less effective is at present inconsistent.
Authors: Darren Er Warburton; Sarah Charlesworth; Adam Ivey; Lindsay Nettlefold; Shannon Sd Bredin Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Dominique Hansen; Josef Niebauer; Veronique Cornelissen; Olga Barna; Daniel Neunhäuserer; Christoph Stettler; Cajsa Tonoli; Eugenio Greco; Robert Fagard; Karin Coninx; Luc Vanhees; Massimo F Piepoli; Roberto Pedretti; Gustavo Rovelo Ruiz; Ugo Corrà; Jean-Paul Schmid; Constantinos H Davos; Frank Edelmann; Ana Abreu; Bernhard Rauch; Marco Ambrosetti; Simona Sarzi Braga; Paul Beckers; Maurizio Bussotti; Pompilio Faggiano; Esteban Garcia-Porrero; Evangelia Kouidi; Michel Lamotte; Rona Reibis; Martijn A Spruit; Tim Takken; Carlo Vigorito; Heinz Völler; Patrick Doherty; Paul Dendale Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 11.136