Literature DB >> 11425320

Factors determining the orientation of axially coordinated imidazoles in heme proteins.

S D Zarić1, D M Popović, E W Knapp.   

Abstract

Factors determining conformations of imidazole axially coordinated to heme in heme proteins were investigated by analyzing 693 hemes in 432 different crystal structures of heme proteins from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), where at least one histidine is ligated to heme. The results from a search of the PDB for protein structures were interpreted with molecular force field computations. Analysis of data from these crystal structures indicated that there are two main factors that determine the orientations of imidazole ligated to heme. These are the interactions of imidazole with the propionic acid side chains of heme and with the histidine backbone. From the analysis of the crystal structures of heme proteins, it turned out that the hydrogen bonding pattern is often not decisive, though it is probably used by nature to fine-tune the orientation of imidazole axially ligated to heme. We found that in many heme proteins the NdeltaH group of imidazole ligated to heme can assume a number of different hydrogen bonds and that in mutant structures the orientation of the ligated imidazole often does not change significantly, although the mutant altered the hydrogen bonding scheme involving the imidazole. Data from crystal structures of heme proteins show that there are preferred orientations of imidazoles with respect to heme. Generally, the NdeltaH group of imidazole is oriented toward the propionic acid groups of the heme. In some cases, the NdeltaH group of imidazole is close to only one of the propionic acid groups, but it is practically never oriented in the opposite direction. The imidazole also adopts a preferred orientation with respect to its histidine backbone such that the plane of the imidazole ring is practically never parallel to the Calpha-Cbeta bond of its histidine backbone. For a given conformation of histidine backbone with respect to heme, as well as imidazole with respect to histidine backbone, the orientation of the imidazole with respect to heme is uniquely determined, since the three orientations depend on each other. Hence, the interaction of the imidazole with the backbone also influences the orientation of the imidazole with respect to the heme. Force field computations are in agreement with experimental data. With this method, we showed that there is an energy minimum when the NdeltaH group of the imidazole is oriented toward the propionic acid groups and that there are minima of energy for orientations where the imidazole ring is orthogonal to the plane defined by the Calpha-Cbeta and Cbeta-Cgamma bonds of the histidine. The computations also demonstrated that these interactions are mainly of electrostatic origin. By taking into account these two major factors, we were able to understand the orientations of axially coordinated imidazoles for all groups of heme proteins, except for the group of cytochrome c peroxidase. In this group, the orientation of the imidazole is determined by a strong hydrogen bond of the NdeltaH group with Asp235.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11425320     DOI: 10.1021/bi010428q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  16 in total

1.  Modulation of function in a minimalist heme-binding membrane protein.

Authors:  Sandip Shinde; Jeanine M Cordova; Brian W Woodrum; Giovanna Ghirlanda
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 3.358

2.  Orientation and stereodynamic paths of planar monodentate ligands in square planar nickel N2S complexes.

Authors:  Roxanne M Jenkins; Michael L Singleton; Lauren A Leamer; Joseph H Reibenspies; Marcetta Y Darensbourg
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  A reexamination of correlations of amino acids with particular secondary structures.

Authors:  Sasa N Malkov; Miodrag V Zivković; Milos V Beljanski; Srdan D Stojanović; Snezana D Zarić
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Molecular modeling and dynamics simulation of a histidine-tagged cytochrome b₅.

Authors:  Ying-Wu Lin; Tian-Lei Ying; Li-Fu Liao
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Electrostatic environment of hemes in proteins: pK(a)s of hydroxyl ligands.

Authors:  Yifan Song; Junjun Mao; M R Gunner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Fe L-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy of low-spin heme relative to non-heme Fe complexes: delocalization of Fe d-electrons into the porphyrin ligand.

Authors:  Rosalie K Hocking; Erik C Wasinger; Yi-Long Yan; Frank M F Degroot; F Ann Walker; Keith O Hodgson; Britt Hedman; Edward I Solomon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Computational studies on imidazole heme conformations.

Authors:  Artur S Galstyan; Snezana D Zarić; Ernst-Walter Knapp
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.358

8.  Hydrogen bonding influence of 1,10-phenanthroline on five-coordinate high-spin imidazole-ligated iron(II) porphyrinates.

Authors:  Chuanjiang Hu; Bruce C Noll; Charles E Schulz; W Robert Scheidt
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 5.165

9.  Hydrogen bonding effects on the electronic configuration of five-coordinate high-spin iron(II) porphyrinates.

Authors:  Chuanjiang Hu; Bruce C Noll; Paula M B Piccoli; Arthur J Schultz; Charles E Schulz; W Robert Scheidt
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  The HP-1 maquette: from an apoprotein structure to a structured hemoprotein designed to promote redox-coupled proton exchange.

Authors:  Steve S Huang; Ronald L Koder; Mitchell Lewis; A Joshua Wand; P Leslie Dutton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.