Literature DB >> 11424652

Missing information in spoken word recognition: nonreleased stop consonants.

T Deelman1, C M Connine.   

Abstract

Cross-modal semantic priming and phoneme monitoring experiments investigated processing of word-final nonreleased stop consonants (e.g., kit may be pronounced /kit/ or /ki/), which are common phonological variants in American English. Both voiced /d/ and voiceless /t/ segments were presented in release and no-release versions. A cross-modal semantic priming task (Experiment 1) showed comparable priming for /d/ and /t/ versions. A second set of stimuli ending in /s/ were presented as intact, missing /s/, or with a mismatching final segment and showed significant but reduced priming for the latter two conditions. Experiment 2 showed that phoneme monitoring reaction time for release and no-release words and onset mismatching stimuli (derived pseudowords) increased as acoustic-phonetic similarity to the intended word decreased. The results suggest that spoken word recognition does not require special mechanisms for processing no-release variants. Rather, the results can be accounted for by means of existing assumptions concerning probabilistic activation that is based on partial activation.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11424652     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.3.656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  5 in total

1.  Closure duration analysis of incomplete stop consonants due to stop-stop interaction.

Authors:  Prasanta Kumar Ghosh; Shrikanth S Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparing non-native and native speech: Are L2 productions more variable?

Authors:  Xin Xie; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  The strength and time course of lexical activation of pronunciation variants.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The Role of Categorical Perception and Acoustic Details in the Processing of Mandarin Tonal Alternations in Contexts: An Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Jung-Yueh Tu; Yu-Fu Chien
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.