Literature DB >> 11423056

Comparison of a daily fixed 2.5-mg warfarin dose with a 5-mg, international normalized ratio adjusted, warfarin dose initially following heart valve replacement.

W Ageno1, A G Turpie, L Steidl, F Ambrosini, R Cattaneo, R L Codari, B Nardo, A Venco.   

Abstract

Patients starting oral anticoagulant therapy after heart valve replacement initially require a lower target international normalized ratio (INR) (2.0, range 1.5 to 2.6) because of a higher risk of bleeding until pericardial wires are removed. In a previous retrospective analysis, we observed a higher sensitivity to warfarin in these patients compared with nonsurgical patients. In a randomized clinical trial, we compared a fixed, lower dose of warfarin (2.5 mg) with the standard treatment consisting of a 5-mg loading dose, then adjusted to the target INR during the first 5 days of anticoagulation. INRs were measured daily, but the fixed dose was only modified on day 3 if the INR was <1.5 or >3.0. One hundred ninety-seven patients were considered eligible for the study. The 2 groups were well matched according to age, gender, body mass index, concomitant treatments, and type of valves implanted. The proportion of INRs >2.6 during the study period was 42.5% in the 5-mg group and 26.2% in the 2.5-mg group (p <0.05), and the proportion of INRs >3.0 on day 3 was 23.9% and 9.5% (p <0.05), respectively. In the 2.5-mg group, 35.7% of patients had an INR <1.5 on day 3 and had the dose increased (vs 3.5%, p <0.001); however, in the 5-mg group, 95.6% had the initial dose reduced, 49.6% had the dose withheld for at least 1 day, and the mean dose during the 5 days of study was 3.08 mg. Average time to achieve therapeutic range was higher in the 2.5-mg group (2.72 vs 1.98 days, p <0.0001), but the approach to the targeted INR was more regular, and the gap between target and mean INR on day 5 was smaller. There were no bleeding or thromboembolic complications in either group. Thus, a lower loading dose of warfarin in patients after heart valve replacement reduces excessive anticoagulation and offers a more regular achievement of the therapeutic target by reducing the number of dose adjustments. Daily monitoring of the INR is still recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11423056     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01582-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  15 in total

Review 1.  Recent clinical trials in valvular heart diseases.

Authors:  Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Optimizing quality care for the oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).

Authors:  Vittorio Pengo; Gentian Denas
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 3.  Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Alexander S Gallus; Ann Wittkowsky; Mark Crowther; Elaine M Hylek; Gualtiero Palareti
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  [Current recommendations for prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with heart valve prostheses].

Authors:  C Gohlke-Bärwolf
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2001-12

5.  Analysis of the first therapeutic-target-achieving time of warfarin therapy and associated factors in patients with pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Xiaowei Gong; Haiyan Wang; Yadong Yuan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Low molecular weight heparin in surgical valve procedures: When and how much for an optimal prophylaxis?

Authors:  Katarzyna Czerwińska-Jelonkiewicz; Marek Cisowski; Andrzej Bochenek; Piotr Buszman; Krzysztof Milewski; Piotr Kunik; Magdalena Mularska; Krzysztof Kocot; Piotr Politowski; Jakub Brączkowski; Agata Trznadel; Michael S Aboodi; Paweł Buszman
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 7.  Optimal loading dose for the initiation of warfarin: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carl Heneghan; Sally Tyndel; Clare Bankhead; Yi Wan; David Keeling; Rafael Perera; Alison Ward
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Long-term prognosis and related factors towards patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism.

Authors:  Xiaowei Gong; Zheng Duan; Yadong Yuan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

9.  Identification of clinical factors predicting warfarin sensitivity after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Karen Tyson; Nevil Hutchinson; Sian Williams; Greg Scutt
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2018-06-05

Review 10.  Warfarin initiation nomograms for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Pedro Garcia; Wilson Ruiz; César Loza Munárriz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.