Literature DB >> 11423052

Fractal correlation properties of heart rate dynamics and adverse events in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

J S Perkiömäki1, W Zareba, J P Daubert, J P Couderc, A Corsello, K Kremer.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of nonlinear and standard heart rate (HR) variability parameters in predicting future adverse events (AEs) in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. In postinfarction studies, nonlinear measures of HR variability obtained from long-term electrocardiographic recordings have been suggested to be better predictors of adverse outcomes than conventional HR variability measures. Fifty-five high-risk patients with reduced left ventricular function and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator had a 10-minute, high-resolution electrocardiographic recording after which they were followed for 25 months on average. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock or death was determined as the end point. The SD of all normal-to-normal RR intervals, the square root of the mean squared differences of successive normal-to-normal RR intervals, and the proportion of interval differences of successive normal-to-normal RR intervals >50 ms, low-frequency and high-frequency powers of the power spectrum and their ratio were calculated as conventional measures of HR variability. The short-term scaling exponent (alpha(1)) and approximate entropy were determined as nonlinear measures of HR variability. AEs occurred in 23 patients (42%). Patients with AEs had significantly lower alpha(1) than event-free patients: 0.81 +/- 0.29 (mean +/- SD) versus 1.01 +/- 0.30 (p = 0.02). None of the other HR variability parameters differed significantly between patients with and without AEs. In the Cox proportional-hazards model including age, gender, ejection fraction, occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia before defibrillator implantation, beta-blocker usage, and alpha(1), only alpha(1) was an independent predictor of AEs: hazard ratio 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.39) for every 0.10 decrease in alpha(1) (p = 0.020). In conclusion, alpha(1) obtained from a 10-minute electrocardiographic recording yields important prognostic information about the risk of AEs in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11423052     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01578-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

Review 1.  Heart rate variability and cardiovascular mortality.

Authors:  Rollo P Villareal; Brant C Liu; Ali Massumi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Heart rate variability: recent developments.

Authors:  Juha S Perkiömäki
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Influence of atropine on fractal and complexity measures of heart rate variability.

Authors:  Juha S Perkiomaki; Wojciech Zareba; Fabio Badilini; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Abnormalities in fractal heart rate dynamics in Chagas disease.

Authors:  Marcos Roberto de Sousa; Heikki V Huikuri; Federico Lombardi; Amanda A Perez; Murilo E D Gomes; Marcio Vinícius Lins Barros; Vladimir Costa Val Barros; Manoel Otávio Costa Rocha; Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  The endogenous circadian pacemaker imparts a scale-invariant pattern of heart rate fluctuations across time scales spanning minutes to 24 hours.

Authors:  Kun Hu; Frank A J L Scheer; Ruud M Buijs; Steven A Shea
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.182

6.  Nonlinear dynamics of blood pressure variability after caffeine consumption.

Authors:  Theodore G Papaioannou; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Nikolaos Ioakeimidis; Nikolaos Alexopoulos; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2006-06

7.  Electrophysiological effects of late percutaneous coronary intervention for infarct-related coronary artery occlusion: the Occluded Artery Trial-Electrophysiological Mechanisms (OAT-EP).

Authors:  Eric J Rashba; Gervasio A Lamas; Jean-Philippe Couderc; Sharri M Hollist; Vladimir Dzavik; Witold Ruzyllo; Viliam Fridrich; Christopher E Buller; Sandra A Forman; Joseph A Kufera; Antonio C Carvalho; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  The suprachiasmatic nucleus functions beyond circadian rhythm generation.

Authors:  K Hu; F A J L Scheer; P Ch Ivanov; R M Buijs; S A Shea
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 9.  The role of the circadian system in fractal neurophysiological control.

Authors:  Benjamin R Pittman-Polletta; Frank A J L Scheer; Matthew P Butler; Steven A Shea; Kun Hu
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2013-04-10

10.  Heart rate variability and non-linear dynamics in risk stratification.

Authors:  Juha S Perkiömäki
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.