BACKGROUND: The Occluded Artery Trial-Electrophysiological Mechanisms (OAT-EP) tested the hypothesis that opening a persistently occluded infarct-related artery by percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting (PCI) after the acute phase of myocardial infarction compared with optimal medical therapy alone reduces markers of vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS:Between April 2003 and December 2005, 300 patients with an occluded native infarct-related artery 3 to 28 days (median, 12 days) after myocardial infarction were randomized to PCI or optimal medical therapy. Ten-minute digital Holter recordings were obtained before randomization, at 30 days, and at 1 year. The primary end point was the change in alpha1, a nonlinear heart rate variability parameter, between baseline and 1 year. Major secondary end points were the changes in the filtered QRS duration on the signal-averaged ECG and variability in T-wave morphology (T-wave variability) between baseline and 1 year. There were no significant differences in the changes in alpha1 (-0.04; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.04), filtered QRS (2.2 ms; 95% CI, -1.4 to 5.9 ms), or T-wave variability (3.0 microV; 95% CI, -4.8 to 10.7 microV) between the PCI and medical therapy groups (medical therapy change minus PCI change). Multivariable analysis revealed that the results were unchanged after adjustment for baseline clinical variables and medication treatments during the Holter recordings. CONCLUSIONS: PCI with stenting of a persistently occluded infarct-related artery during the subacute phase after myocardial infarction compared with medical therapy alone had no significant effect on changes in heart rate variability, the time-domain signal-averaged ECG, or T-wave variability during the first year after myocardial infarction. These findings are consistent with the lack of clinical benefit, including no reduction in sudden death, with PCI for stable patients with persistently occluded infarct-related arteries after myocardial infarction in the main OAT.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Occluded Artery Trial-Electrophysiological Mechanisms (OAT-EP) tested the hypothesis that opening a persistently occluded infarct-related artery by percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting (PCI) after the acute phase of myocardial infarction compared with optimal medical therapy alone reduces markers of vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 2003 and December 2005, 300 patients with an occluded native infarct-related artery 3 to 28 days (median, 12 days) after myocardial infarction were randomized to PCI or optimal medical therapy. Ten-minute digital Holter recordings were obtained before randomization, at 30 days, and at 1 year. The primary end point was the change in alpha1, a nonlinear heart rate variability parameter, between baseline and 1 year. Major secondary end points were the changes in the filtered QRS duration on the signal-averaged ECG and variability in T-wave morphology (T-wave variability) between baseline and 1 year. There were no significant differences in the changes in alpha1 (-0.04; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.04), filtered QRS (2.2 ms; 95% CI, -1.4 to 5.9 ms), or T-wave variability (3.0 microV; 95% CI, -4.8 to 10.7 microV) between the PCI and medical therapy groups (medical therapy change minus PCI change). Multivariable analysis revealed that the results were unchanged after adjustment for baseline clinical variables and medication treatments during the Holter recordings. CONCLUSIONS: PCI with stenting of a persistently occluded infarct-related artery during the subacute phase after myocardial infarction compared with medical therapy alone had no significant effect on changes in heart rate variability, the time-domain signal-averaged ECG, or T-wave variability during the first year after myocardial infarction. These findings are consistent with the lack of clinical benefit, including no reduction in sudden death, with PCI for stable patients with persistently occluded infarct-related arteries after myocardial infarction in the main OAT.
Authors: Kim A Eagle; Shaun G Goodman; Alvaro Avezum; Andrzej Budaj; Cynthia M Sullivan; José López-Sendón Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-02-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J S Perkiömäki; W Zareba; J Ruta; S Dubner; C Madoery; P Deedwania; M Karcz; A Bayes de Luna Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2001-10-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: G Breithardt; M E Cain; N el-Sherif; N C Flowers; V Hombach; M Janse; M B Simson; G Steinbeck Journal: Circulation Date: 1991-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jean-Philippe Couderc; Wojciech Zareba; Scott McNitt; Pierre Maison-Blanche; Arthur J Moss Journal: Europace Date: 2007-07-17 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Ahmet Celik; Nihat Kalay; Omer Sahin; Mustafa Duran; Hasan Korkmaz; Mehmet Ali Kobat; Ertugrul Kurtoglu; Ali Dogan; Sabahattin Muhtaroglu; Oguzhan Baran; Mehmet Tugrul Inanc; Ibrahim Ozdogru; Abdurrahman Oguzhan; Ramazan Topsakal Journal: J Clin Med Res Date: 2012-01-17
Authors: Ahmet Celik; Nihat Kalay; Hasan Korkmaz; Orhan Dogdu; Omer Sahin; Deniz Elcik; Seyhan Karacavus; Ali Dogan; Tugrul Inanc; Ibrahim Ozdogru; Abdurrahman Oguzhan; Ramazan Topsakal Journal: Cardiol Res Date: 2011-09-20