Literature DB >> 11420334

Establishing MIC breakpoints and the interpretation of in vitro susceptibility tests.

A P MacGowan1, R Wise.   

Abstract

The purpose of undertaking susceptibility testing, by whatever method, is to attempt to integrate the susceptibility of a population of potential pathogens with the pharmacokinetics of the antimicrobial and, whenever possible, to review this relationship in the light of clinical experience following therapy in clinical trials. Breakpoints are discriminatory antimicrobial concentrations used in the interpretation of results of susceptibility testing to define isolates as susceptible, intermediate or resistant. Clinical, pharmacological and microbiological considerations are important in setting breakpoints, and the ideal mix of these factors is unknown. Different countries have different approaches to this problem but, by and large, these approaches have much in common. This paper attempts to summarize the philosophy of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) Working Party in its approach to setting breakpoints and to update the activities of the Working Party since it initially published breakpoints, approximately 10 years ago. The formula outlined by the BSAC Working Party in 1991 has been used to set the breakpoints presented here. The Working Party accepts that in the light of new knowledge, there is a need to reassess how breakpoints are defined, and this paper also summarizes the future activities of the Working Party.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11420334     DOI: 10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  32 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in critical illness.

Authors:  Rina Mehrotra; Raffaele De Gaudio; Mark Palazzo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Setting and revising antibacterial susceptibility breakpoints.

Authors:  John Turnidge; David L Paterson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Multiple antimicrobial resistance of gram-negative bacteria from natural oligotrophic lakes under distinct anthropogenic influence in a tropical region.

Authors:  D S Pontes; F A Pinheiro; C I Lima-Bittencourt; R L M Guedes; L Cursino; F Barbosa; F R Santos; E Chartone-Souza; A M A Nascimento
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Comparative study of the mutant prevention concentrations of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and gemifloxacin against pneumococci.

Authors:  Kim Credito; Klaudia Kosowska-Shick; Pamela McGhee; Glenn A Pankuch; Peter C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  A long journey from minimum inhibitory concentration testing to clinically predictive breakpoints: deterministic and probabilistic approaches in deriving breakpoints.

Authors:  A Dalhoff; P G Ambrose; J W Mouton
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Proposal of a pharmacokinetically optimized dosage regimen of antibiotics in patients receiving continuous hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Takehito Yamamoto; Nobuhiro Yasuno; Shoichi Katada; Akihiro Hisaka; Norio Hanafusa; Eisei Noiri; Naoki Yahagi; Toshiro Fujita; Hiroshi Suzuki
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  The Role of Topical Antiseptic Agents Within Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategies for Prevention and Treatment of Surgical Site and Chronic Open Wound Infection.

Authors:  Christopher D Roberts; David J Leaper; Ojan Assadian
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Effect of differences in MIC values on clinical outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections caused by gram-negative organisms treated with levofloxacin.

Authors:  Robyn Defife; Marc H Scheetz; Joe M Feinglass; Michael J Postelnick; Kimberly K Scarsi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  A fusidic acid-resistant epidemic strain of Staphylococcus aureus carries the fusB determinant, whereas fusA mutations are prevalent in other resistant isolates.

Authors:  Alexander J O'Neill; Anders R Larsen; Anne S Henriksen; Ian Chopra
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Antimicrobial breakpoint estimation accounting for variability in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Goue Denis Gohore Bi; Jun Li; Fahima Nekka
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.