Literature DB >> 11418537

Consumer informatics supporting patients as co-producers of quality.

B Kaplan1, P F Brennan.   

Abstract

The track entitled "Consumer Informatics Supporting Patients as Co-Producers of Quality" at the AMIA Spring 2000 Congress was devoted to examining the new field of consumer health informatics. This area is developing rapidly, as worldwide changes are occurring in the organization and delivery of health care and in the traditional roles of patient and provider. This paper describes the key themes of the track; implications of the growing area of consumer health informatics; and recommendations for informatics research, design, and policy. Key themes that emerged from the panels and discussions involved changes in roles of consumers and providers; supporting a patient-provider-information technology partnership; virtual, not physical, structure for health care and health care information delivery; and health care as an integrated part of one's life. Panelists and participants at the Congress developed recommendations for informatics research, design, and policy, with an overarching focus on how to support the patient-provider-information technology partnership to provide more patient-centered health care. They recommended that AMIA take an active leadership role in consumer health informatics. Specific recommendations were made concerning research, new patient record systems, provider support, information access and evaluation, and policy and regulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11418537      PMCID: PMC130075          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  36 in total

1.  Health communications: nursing education for increased visibility and effectiveness.

Authors:  M Chaffee
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 2.  One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; V J Strecher; B Glassman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1999

Review 3.  Electronic communication with patients. Evaluation of distance medicine technology.

Authors:  E A Balas; F Jaffrey; G J Kuperman; S A Boren; G D Brown; F Pinciroli; J A Mitchell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-07-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  The potential of consumer health informatics.

Authors:  T K Houston; H E Ehrenberger
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.315

5.  Health informatics and community health: support for patients as collaborators in care.

Authors:  P F Brennan
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  Assessing cultural sensitivity in printed cancer materials.

Authors:  J J Guidry; V D Walker
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

7.  Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association.

Authors:  M A Winker; A Flanagin; B Chi-Lum; J White; K Andrews; R L Kennett; C D DeAngelis; R A Musacchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 Mar 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Assessing literacy for patient teaching: perspectives of adults with low literacy skills.

Authors:  S M Brez; M Taylor
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Requests for medical advice from patients and families to health care providers who publish on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  L E Widman; D A Tong
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-01-27

10.  The future of clinical communication in an electronic environment.

Authors:  P F Brennan
Journal:  Holist Nurs Pract       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.000

View more
  26 in total

1.  Toward an informatics research agenda: key people and organizational issues.

Authors:  B Kaplan; P F Brennan; A F Dowling; C P Friedman; V Peel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  I Sim; P Gorman; R A Greenes; R B Haynes; B Kaplan; H Lehmann; P C Tang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Information systems can prevent errors and improve quality.

Authors:  E A Balas
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Is there a digital divide among physicians? A geographic analysis of information technology in Southern California physician offices.

Authors:  Douglas S Bell; Dianna M Daly; Paul Robinson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health.

Authors:  E Vance Wilson; Nancy K Lankton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Promoting health literacy.

Authors:  Alexa T McCray
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Parents as partners in obtaining the medication history.

Authors:  Stephen C Porter; Isaac S Kohane; Donald A Goldmann
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Consumer health information Websites: a survey of design elements found in sites developed in academic environments.

Authors:  Andrea M Ketchum
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-10

9.  How patients use access to their full health records: a qualitative study of patients in general practice.

Authors:  Brian Fisher; Vanita Bhavnani; Marlene Winfield
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Realizing the Potential of Patient Engagement: Designing IT to Support Health in Everyday Life.

Authors:  Laurie L Novak; Kim M Unertl; Richard J Holden
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.