Literature DB >> 11417788

Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile.

M J Tovée1, P L Cornelissen.   

Abstract

Two important cues to female physical attractiveness are body mass index (BMI) and shape. In front view, it seems that BMI may be more important than shape; however, is it true in profile where shape cues may be stronger? There is also the question of whether men and women have the same perception of female physical attractiveness. Some studies have suggested that they do not, but this runs contrary to mate selection theory. This predicts that women will have the same perception of female attractiveness as men do. This allows them to judge their own relative value, with respect to their peer group, and match this value with the value of a prospective mate. To clarify these issues we asked 40 male and 40 female undergraduates to rate a set of pictures of real women (50 in front-view and 50 in profile) for attractiveness. BMI was the primary predictor of attractiveness in both front and profile, and the putative visual cues to BMI showed a higher degree of view-invariance than shape cues such as the waist-hip ratio (WHR). Consistent with mate selection theory, there were no significant differences in the rating of attractiveness by male and female raters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11417788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  17 in total

1.  Visual perception of female physical attractiveness.

Authors:  J Fan; F Liu; J Wu; W Dai
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Visual perception of male body attractiveness.

Authors:  J Fan; W Dai; F Liu; J Wu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Electrophysiological evidence of perceived sexual attractiveness for human female bodies varying in waist-to-hip ratio.

Authors:  Marzia Del Zotto; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Visual exposure to obesity: Experimental effects on attraction toward overweight men and mate choice in females.

Authors:  E Robinson; P Christiansen
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Human female attractiveness: waveform analysis of body shape.

Authors:  Martin J Tovée; Peter J B Hancock; Sasan Mahmoodi; Ben R R Singleton; Piers L Cornelissen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  A preliminary investigation into the potential role of waist hip ratio (WHR) preference within the assortative mating hypothesis of autistic spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Mark Brosnan; Ian Walker
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2008-07-04

7.  A test of the facultative calibration/reactive heritability model of extraversion.

Authors:  Hannah J Haysom; Dorian G Mitchem; Anthony J Lee; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Matthew C Keller; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.178

8.  Perceptions of underweight images: are women with anorexia nervosa perceived as attractive and healthy?

Authors:  B L Whisenhunt; D L Drab-Hudson; L R Stanek; A J Dock; B J Allen; R C Vincent; C Levesque-Bristol
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  "What women like": influence of motion and form on esthetic body perception.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Serena Siega; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-09

10.  Resource security impacts men's female breast size preferences.

Authors:  Viren Swami; Martin J Tovée
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.