R. Moe-Nilssen1. 1. Division of Physiotherapy Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Ulriksdal 8c, N-5009 Bergen, Norway.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The validity of assessing balance in gait by measuring balance in standing is questionable. Better methods for measuring balance during walking are therefore needed. DESIGN: It is suggested that the individual will demonstrate adequate postural control by moving a reference point near the body centre of mass (CoM) smoothly towards an intentional goal, even though movements of the extremities show variability consistent with a changing environment. BACKGROUND: In spite of an increased interest in variability as a prerequisite for motor control, gait analysis methods focus, to a large extent, on symmetry and repeatability of movements in stereotyped settings. METHODS: Acceleration of a reference point over the lumbar spine is registered during walking by a portable, triaxial accelerometry system. RESULTS: A quadratic relation between acceleration root mean square (RMS) and walking speed is demonstrated, and a second degree polynomial can therefore be computed as a curve estimate, if acceleration RMS representing at least three walking speeds are available. CONCLUSIONS: The relation between acceleration over a reference point on the trunk and walking speed can be compared between trials and also when walking speeds are self-selected. Calibration procedures and testing of the instrument for precision and accuracy in a mechanical testing jig are described in a companion article. RELEVANCE: This study suggests a new alternative to the traditions of measuring balance in standing and movements of the legs in walking. The method allows balance in gait to be assessed at self-selected speeds in relevant environmental conditions, which may facilitate gait analysis in the clinic and improve the validity of the results.
OBJECTIVE: The validity of assessing balance in gait by measuring balance in standing is questionable. Better methods for measuring balance during walking are therefore needed. DESIGN: It is suggested that the individual will demonstrate adequate postural control by moving a reference point near the body centre of mass (CoM) smoothly towards an intentional goal, even though movements of the extremities show variability consistent with a changing environment. BACKGROUND: In spite of an increased interest in variability as a prerequisite for motor control, gait analysis methods focus, to a large extent, on symmetry and repeatability of movements in stereotyped settings. METHODS: Acceleration of a reference point over the lumbar spine is registered during walking by a portable, triaxial accelerometry system. RESULTS: A quadratic relation between acceleration root mean square (RMS) and walking speed is demonstrated, and a second degree polynomial can therefore be computed as a curve estimate, if acceleration RMS representing at least three walking speeds are available. CONCLUSIONS: The relation between acceleration over a reference point on the trunk and walking speed can be compared between trials and also when walking speeds are self-selected. Calibration procedures and testing of the instrument for precision and accuracy in a mechanical testing jig are described in a companion article. RELEVANCE: This study suggests a new alternative to the traditions of measuring balance in standing and movements of the legs in walking. The method allows balance in gait to be assessed at self-selected speeds in relevant environmental conditions, which may facilitate gait analysis in the clinic and improve the validity of the results.
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; David McGurl; David Wert; Jessie M Vanswearingen; Subashan Perera; Rakie Cham; Stephanie Studenski Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Matthew A D Brodie; Milou J M Coppens; Stephen R Lord; Nigel H Lovell; Yves J Gschwind; Stephen J Redmond; Michael Benjamin Del Rosario; Kejia Wang; Daina L Sturnieks; Michela Persiani; Kim Delbaere Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 2.602