Literature DB >> 11415593

Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain.

J Cholewicki1, S M McGill.   

Abstract

One important mechanical function of the lumbar spine is to support the upper body by transmitting compressive and shearing forces to the lower body during the performance of everyday activities. To enable the successful transmission of these forces, mechanical stability of the spinal system must be assured. The purpose of this study was to develop a method and to quantify the mechanical stability of the lumbar spine in vivo during various three-dimensional dynamic tasks. A lumbar spine model, one that is sensitive to the various ways that individuals utilize their muscles and ligaments, was used to estimate the lumbar spine stability index three times per second throughout the duration of each trial. Anatomically, this model included a rigid pelvis, ribcage, five vertebrae, 90 muscle fascicles and lumped parameter discs, ligaments and facets. The method consisted of three sub-models: a cross-bridge bond distribution-moment muscle model for estimating muscle force and stiffness from the electromyogram, a rigid link segment body model for estimating external forces and moments acting on the lumbar vertebrae, and an 18 degrees of freedom lumbar spine model for estimating moments produced by 90 muscle fascicles and lumped passive tissues. Individual muscle forces and their associated stiffness estimated from the EMG-assisted optimization algorithm, along with external forces were used for calculating the relative stability index of the lumbar spine for three subjects. It appears that there is an ample stability safety margin during tasks that demand a high muscular effort. However, lighter tasks present a potential hazard of spine buckling, especially if some reduction in passive joint stiffness is present. Several hypotheses on the mechanism of injury associated with low loads and aetiology of chronic back pain are presented in the context of lumbar spine stability.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 11415593     DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00035-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  124 in total

1.  Factors contributing to low back pain in rowers.

Authors:  D A Reid; P J McNair
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Why exercise in paraplegia?

Authors:  M Kjaer
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Influence of fatigue in neuromuscular control of spinal stability.

Authors:  Kevin P Granata; Greg P Slota; Sara E Wilson
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads--application of kinematics-based algorithm.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; M El-Rich; D G Pop; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Movement of the upper body and muscle activity patterns following a rapidly applied load: the influence of pre-load alterations.

Authors:  T Bull Andersen; M Essendrop; B Schibye
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  The effects of low back pain on natural breath control during a lowering task.

Authors:  Eric M Lamberg; Marshall Hagins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  The effectiveness of resistance training using unstable surfaces and devices for rehabilitation.

Authors:  David Behm; Juan Carlos Colado
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

8.  Detecting dynamical boundaries from kinematic data in biomechanics.

Authors:  Shane D Ross; Martin L Tanaka; Carmine Senatore
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.642

9.  Lengthening but not shortening history of paraspinal muscle spindles in the low back alters their dynamic sensitivity.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Architectural and morphological assessment of rat abdominal wall muscles: comparison for use as a human model.

Authors:  Stephen H M Brown; Karina Banuelos; Samuel R Ward; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.