Literature DB >> 11412573

[Do the new criteria of the American Diabetes Association lead to earlier diagnosis of type-2 diabetes mellitus?].

M Mata Cases1, X Cos Claramunt, E Pujol Ribera, I Bobé Molina, R Centelles Fernández, R Ortiz López, A Ramos Fuertes, C Royo Pastor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the period of time between the first occasional fasting hyperglycaemia (OFH) and the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), using the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria or the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria.
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study.
SETTING: Urban primary care centre.
SUBJECTS: 104 patients with DM2 diagnosed between 1991 and 1995 who had a previous OFH. MEASUREMENTS: Age, gender and other risk factors, dates of the first OFH (fasting plasma glucose >= 110 mg/dl), the diagnosis according to WHO criteria (2 fasting plasma glucose >= 140 mg/dl or >= 200 mg/dl two hours after the oral glucose test tolerance (OGTT)) or with the ADA criteria (2 fasting plasma glucose >= 126 mg/dl), and the intervals in months between them.
RESULTS: Of the 222 diagnosed patients, 104 (47%) had previous OFH. Age at diagnosis was 60.8 (SD 10.1) and 53% were women. OGTT was performed in 51 cases (49%). The median (range) of the interval between the first OFH and diagnosis was 16 months (0-101) for those who were undertaken an OGTT, and 45 months (1-104) for those who were not (p = 0.003). In these last ones, ADA criteria reduced the interval to 31 months (0-97) (p < 0.001). In 27 of these patients who did not satisfy both criteria at the same time, ADA criteria reduced the interval to 10 months (0-93) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Not performing the OGTT means a delay in diagnosis which can be countered by applying the ADA criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11412573      PMCID: PMC7681725          DOI: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78890-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN: 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


  22 in total

1.  Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Impact of new diagnostic criteria for diabetes on different populations.

Authors:  J E Shaw; M de Courten; E J Boyko; P Z Zimmet
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Relationship between fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin: potential for false-positive diagnoses of type 2 diabetes using new diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  M B Davidson; D L Schriger; A L Peters; B Lorber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Comparison of diabetes diagnostic categories in the U.S. population according to the 1997 American Diabetes Association and 1980-1985 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  M I Harris; R C Eastman; C C Cowie; K M Flegal; M S Eberhardt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Effects of changing diagnostic criteria on the risk of developing diabetes.

Authors:  S F Dinneen; D Maldonado; C L Leibson; G G Klee; H Li; L J Melton; R A Rizza
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  A clinical approach for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: an analysis using glycosylated hemoglobin levels. Meta-analysis Research Group on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Using Glycated Hemoglobin Levels.

Authors:  A L Peters; M B Davidson; D L Schriger; V Hasselblad
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.

Authors:  K G Alberti; P Z Zimmet
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Diabetes in older adults: comparison of 1997 American Diabetes Association classification of diabetes mellitus with 1985 WHO classification.

Authors:  P W Wahl; P J Savage; B M Psaty; T J Orchard; J A Robbins; R P Tracy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  [What is diabetics' real cardiovascular risk?].

Authors:  J M Baena Díez; J L Martínez Martínez; B Alvarez Pérez; J Tomàs Pelegrina
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  [Glycated haemoglobin for the diagnosis of diabetes. A universal standard?].

Authors:  Rafael Llanes De Torres
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 1.137

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.