Literature DB >> 11410715

Comparison of global brain gene expression profiles between inbred long-sleep and inbred short-sleep mice by high-density gene array hybridization.

Y Xu1, M Ehringer, F Yang, J M Sikela.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inbred long-sleep (ILS) and short-sleep (ISS) mice show significant central nervous system-mediated differences in sleep time for sedative dose of ethanol and are frequently used as a rodent model for ethanol sensitivity. In this study, we have used complementary DNA (cDNA) array hybridization methodology to identify genes that are differentially expressed between the brains of ILS and ISS mice.
METHODS: To carry out this analysis, we used both the gene discovery array (GDA) and the Mouse GEM 1 Microarray. GDA consists of 18,378 nonredundant mouse cDNA clones on a single nylon filter. Complex probes were prepared from total brain mRNA of ILS or ISS mice by using reverse transcription and 33P labeling. The labeled probes were hybridized in parallel to the gene array filters. Data from GDA experiments were analyzed with SQL-Plus and Oracle 8. The GEM microarray includes 8,730 sequence-verified clones on a glass chip. Two fluorescently labeled probes were used to hybridize a microarray simultaneously. Data from GEM experiments were analyzed by using the GEMTools software package (Incyte). Differentially expressed genes identified from each method were confirmed by relative quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
RESULTS: A total of 41 genes or expressed sequence tags (ESTs) display significant expression level differences between brains of ILS and ISS mice after GDA, GEM1 hybridization, and quantitative RT-PCR confirmation. Among them, 18 clones were expressed higher in ILS mice, and 23 clones were expressed higher in ISS mice. The individual gene or EST's function and mapping information have been analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified 41 genes that are differentially expressed between brains of ILS and ISS mice. Some of them may have biological relevance in mediation of phenotypic variation between ILS and ISS mice for ethanol sensitivity. This study also demonstrates that parallel gene expression comparison with high-density cDNA arrays is a rapid and efficient way to discover potential genes and pathways involved in alcoholism and alcohol-related physiologic processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11410715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  18 in total

1.  Microarray analysis of gene expression in rat hippocampus after chronic ethanol treatment.

Authors:  Mariko Saito; John Smiley; Reka Toth; Csaba Vadasz
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetic studies of alcohol self-administration and withdrawal.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Prediction of cis-QTLs in a pair of inbred mouse strains with the use of expression and haplotype data from public databases.

Authors:  Richard A Radcliffe; Michael J Lee; Robert W Williams
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 4.  Genetic factors influencing alcohol dependence.

Authors:  R D Mayfield; R A Harris; M A Schuckit
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Transcriptome analysis of Inbred Long Sleep and Inbred Short Sleep mice.

Authors:  T M Darlington; M A Ehringer; C Larson; T L Phang; R A Radcliffe
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.449

6.  Gene expression profiles of light-induced apoptosis in arrestin/rhodopsin kinase-deficient mouse retinas.

Authors:  S Choi; W Hao; C K Chen; M I Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Using expression genetics to study the neurobiology of ethanol and alcoholism.

Authors:  Sean P Farris; Aaron R Wolen; Michael F Miles
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.230

Review 8.  Molecular targets of alcohol action: Translational research for pharmacotherapy development and screening.

Authors:  Giorgio Gorini; Richard L Bell; R Dayne Mayfield
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.622

9.  Exome sequencing and arrayCGH detection of gene sequence and copy number variation between ILS and ISS mouse strains.

Authors:  Laura Dumas; C Michael Dickens; Nathan Anderson; Jonathan Davis; Beth Bennett; Richard A Radcliffe; James M Sikela
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Microarray analysis of mouse brain gene expression following acute ethanol treatment.

Authors:  Julie A Treadwell; Shiva M Singh
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.