D Hoffmeister1, K Ichinose, A Bechthold. 1. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Pharmazeutische Biologie, Stefan-Meier-Strasse, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Two deoxysugar glycosyltransferases (GTs), UrdGT1b and UrdGT1c, involved in urdamycin biosynthesis share 91% identical amino acids. However, the two GTs show different specificities for both nucleotide sugar and acceptor substrate. Generally, it is proposed that GTs are two-domain proteins with a nucleotide binding domain and an acceptor substrate site with the catalytic center in an interface cleft between these domains. Our work aimed at finding out the region responsible for determination of substrate specificities of these two urdamycin GTs. RESULTS: A series of 10 chimeric GT genes were constructed consisting of differently sized and positioned portions of urdGT1b and urdGT1c. Gene expression experiments in host strains Streptomyces fradiae Ax and XTC show that nine of 10 chimeric GTs are still functional, with either UrdGT1b- or UrdGT1c-like activity. A 31 amino acid region (aa 52-82) located close to the N-terminus of these enzymes, which differs in 18 residues, was identified to control both sugar donor and acceptor substrate specificity. Only one chimeric gene product of the 10 was not functional. Targeted stepwise alterations of glycine 226 (G226R, G226S, G226SR) were made to reintroduce residues conserved among streptomycete GTs. Alterations G226S and G226R restored a weak activity, whereas G226SR showed an activity comparable with other functional chimeras. CONCLUSIONS: A nucleotide sugar binding motif is present in the C-terminal moiety of UrdGT1b and UrdGT1c from S. fradiae. We could demonstrate that it is an N-terminal section that determines specificity for the nucleotide sugar and also the acceptor substrate. This finding directs the way towards engineering this class of streptomycete enzymes for antibiotic derivatization applications. Amino acids 226 and 227, located outside the putative substrate binding site, might be part of a larger protein structure, perhaps a solvent channel to the catalytic center. Therefore, they could play a role in substrate accessibility to it.
BACKGROUND: Two deoxysugar glycosyltransferases (GTs), UrdGT1b and UrdGT1c, involved in urdamycin biosynthesis share 91% identical amino acids. However, the two GTs show different specificities for both nucleotide sugar and acceptor substrate. Generally, it is proposed that GTs are two-domain proteins with a nucleotide binding domain and an acceptor substrate site with the catalytic center in an interface cleft between these domains. Our work aimed at finding out the region responsible for determination of substrate specificities of these two urdamycin GTs. RESULTS: A series of 10 chimeric GT genes were constructed consisting of differently sized and positioned portions of urdGT1b and urdGT1c. Gene expression experiments in host strains Streptomyces fradiae Ax and XTC show that nine of 10 chimeric GTs are still functional, with either UrdGT1b- or UrdGT1c-like activity. A 31 amino acid region (aa 52-82) located close to the N-terminus of these enzymes, which differs in 18 residues, was identified to control both sugardonor and acceptor substrate specificity. Only one chimeric gene product of the 10 was not functional. Targeted stepwise alterations of glycine 226 (G226R, G226S, G226SR) were made to reintroduce residues conserved among streptomycete GTs. Alterations G226S and G226R restored a weak activity, whereas G226SR showed an activity comparable with other functional chimeras. CONCLUSIONS: A nucleotide sugar binding motif is present in the C-terminal moiety of UrdGT1b and UrdGT1c from S. fradiae. We could demonstrate that it is an N-terminal section that determines specificity for the nucleotide sugar and also the acceptor substrate. This finding directs the way towards engineering this class of streptomycete enzymes for antibiotic derivatization applications. Amino acids 226 and 227, located outside the putative substrate binding site, might be part of a larger protein structure, perhaps a solvent channel to the catalytic center. Therefore, they could play a role in substrate accessibility to it.
Authors: Aram Chang; Shanteri Singh; Kate E Helmich; Randal D Goff; Craig A Bingman; Jon S Thorson; George N Phillips Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C Bihlmaier; E Welle; C Hofmann; K Welzel; A Vente; E Breitling; M Müller; S Glaser; A Bechthold Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Tina Strobel; Yvonne Schmidt; Anton Linnenbrink; Andriy Luzhetskyy; Marta Luzhetska; Takaaki Taguchi; Elke Brötz; Thomas Paululat; Maryna Stasevych; Oleg Stanko; Volodymyr Novikov; Andreas Bechthold Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Irfan Baig; Madan Kharel; Anton Kobylyanskyy; Lili Zhu; Yuriy Rebets; Bohdan Ostash; Andriy Luzhetskyy; Andreas Bechthold; Victor A Fedorenko; Jürgen Rohr Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2006-11-27 Impact factor: 15.336