Literature DB >> 11410299

Variations of intracavitary applicator geometry during multiple HDR brachytherapy insertions in carcinoma cervix and its influence on reporting as per ICRU report 38.

N R Datta1, S Kumar, K J Das, C M Pandey, S Halder, S Ayyagari.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper examines the extent of variation in the applicator geometry during multiple high dose rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) applications and its impact on reporting as per ICRU report 38.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty orthogonal radiographs from 20 consecutive patients of carcinoma cervix (FIGO stages, IIA-IIIB) having four HDR ICBT applications of 6 Gy each at weekly intervals following teletherapy were evaluated. The applicator consisted of a flexible intrauterine tandem (IUT) independent of the ovoid assembly. The applicator geometry was evaluated in terms of: alpha angle, beta angle, intrauterine length (IUTL), interovoid (IOV), os to right ovoid (ORT) and os to left ovoid (OLT) distances along with vertical (VDL) and anteroposterior displacements (ADL) of the os with respect to the ovoids. The Cartesian co-ordinates (X, Y, and Z) of the IUT tip, centre of both ovoids and os were also measured. Doses to right point A (ARD), left point A (ALD), along with a reference volume of 6 Gy for ICRU height (IRH), width (IRW), thickness (IRT) and volume (IRV) were estimated for each application.
RESULTS: Highly significant differences (P<0.001) between four insertions in any given patient across 20 patients for alpha angle, beta angle, IUTL, IOV, ORT, VDL, co-ordinates of the IUT, ovoids and os were observed, except for ADL (P=0.041) and OLT (P=0.247). As a consequence, variations were observed in ARD (P=0.027), ALD (P=0.017); IRH, IRW, IRT and IRV (all P<0.001). Applicator factors which influenced the various dose specification parameters were: beta angle and ORT for both ARD and ALD; UTLN, VDL and ORT for IRH; UTLN and IOV for IRW; UTLN for IRT and VDL for the 6 Gy IRV.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant variation of the applicator geometry and its movement was observed in patients undergoing multiple HDR ICBT. This could have implications for reporting dose and volume specifications as required by ICRU report 38.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11410299     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00352-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  9 in total

Review 1.  In vivo dosimetry: trends and prospects for brachytherapy.

Authors:  G Kertzscher; A Rosenfeld; S Beddar; K Tanderup; J E Cygler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Brachytherapy in cancer cervix: Time to move ahead from point A?

Authors:  Anurita Srivastava; Niloy Ranjan Datta
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-10

3.  Study of positional dependence of dose to bladder, pelvic wall and rectal points in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Anil Kumar Talluri; Krishnam Raju Alluri; Deleep Kumar Gudipudi; Shabbir Ahamed; Madhusudhana M Sresty; Aparna Yarrama Reddy
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-10

4.  Positional variation of applicators during low dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Kirthi Koushik; Ramesh Bilimagga; Nirmala Rao; M G Janaki; Arul Ponni; A G Rajeev
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-10-13

5.  Interobserver variation in rectal and bladder doses in orthogonal film-based treatment planning of cancer of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  P Raghukumar; K Raghu Ram Nair; B Saju; G Zhenia; K T Divya; V S Shaiju; V Padmanabhan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2008-10

6.  A comparison of dose distribution from Manchester-style and Fletcher-style intracavitary brachytherapy applicator systems in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Bishan Basu; Swapnendu Basu; Bikramjit Chakraborti; Suman Ghorai; Phalguni Gupta; Sajal Ghosh; Koushik Ghosh; J Jayanti
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-12-28

7.  Magnitude and Implications of Interfraction Variations in Organ Doses during High Dose Rate Brachytherapy of Cervix Cancer: A CT Based Planning Study.

Authors:  Santam Chakraborty; Firuza D Patel; Vijay M Patil; Arun S Oinam; Suresh C Sharma
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2014-02-03

8.  Dosimetric evaluation of Point A and volume-based high-dose-rate plans: a single institution study on adaptive brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Arun George Paul; Adrian Nalichowski; Judith Abrams; Peter Paximadis; Ling Zhuang; Steven Miller
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-06-28

9.  Interfraction Dose Variations in Organs at Risk during CT-Based High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix: An Early Experience of a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Neelam Sharma; Manoj K Semwal; Abhishek Purkayastha
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.