Literature DB >> 11408871

Is vaginal birth after cesarean safe? Experience at a community hospital.

H Blanchette1, M Blanchette, J McCabe, S Vincent.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of promoting a trial of labor after prior cesarean birth in a community hospital. STUDY
DESIGN: A 4-year prospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who had prior cesarean births (N = 1481). A comparison of outcomes was performed between those who elected repeat cesarean delivery (n = 727) and those who attempted a trial of labor after previous cesarean(s) (n = 754).
RESULTS: We found that the vaginal birth after cesarean attempt rate was 50.9% and declined significantly during the last 2 years of the study. The elective repeat cesarean rate was 49.1% and increased significantly during the last 2 years of the study. In addition, we found that neonatal outcomes were similar, with the exception of 2 neonatal deaths caused by uterine rupture. Twelve uterine ruptures occurred (1.6%), and 11 of the 12 ruptures involved either induction or augmentation of labor, or both.
CONCLUSIONS: A trial of vaginal birth after cesarean is safe provided that induction of labor is not used. The uterine rupture rate of 1.6% is higher than reported in the literature; this may reflect underreporting by community hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11408871     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.114852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Vaginal delivery after caesarean section. Study's focus on induction v spontaneous labour neglects spontaneous deliver.

Authors:  B A Daviss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-12-01

Review 2.  Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Marian S McDonagh; Patricia Osterweil; Peggy Nygren; Benjamin K S Chan; Mark Helfand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

3.  Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2009.

Authors:  Sayeedha F G Uddin; Alan E Simon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-09

4.  Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Sharon A Gilbert; William A Grobman; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Dwight J Rouse; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Steve N Caritis; Paul J Meis; Yoram Sorokin; Marshall Carpenter; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Evaluation of Maternal-Neonatal Outcomes in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Referred to Maternity of Academic Hospitals.

Authors:  Masoumeh Mirteymouri; Sedigheh Ayati; Leyla Pourali; Mahboubeh Mahmoodinia; Maliheh Mahmoodinia
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2016-12

6.  Oxytocin use in trial of labor after cesarean and its relationship with risk of uterine rupture in women with one previous cesarean section: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Huan Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Shouling Luo; Weirong Gu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  At what price? A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing trial of labour after previous caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Christopher G Fawsitt; Jane Bourke; Richard A Greene; Claire M Everard; Aileen Murphy; Jennifer E Lutomski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Spontaneous uterine rupture after abdominal myomectomy at the gestational age of 20 weeks in pregnancy: A case report.

Authors:  Hamideh Pakniat; Nasrin Soofizadeh; Marzieh Beigom Khezri
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)       Date:  2016-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.