Literature DB >> 11408144

Feasibility of ultrasound cataract surgery with a 1.4 mm incision.

H Tsuneoka1, T Shiba, Y Takahashi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the feasibility of performing ultrasound (US) phacoemulsification cataract surgery through a 1.4 mm incision using conventional phacoemulsification equipment but removing the infusion sleeve from the US tip.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Jikei University, Tokyo, Japan.
METHODS: The infusion sleeve was removed from a 20 gauge US tip, and the sleeveless tip was inserted in a 1.4 mm incision in a postmortem porcine eye, providing infusion through a side port; phacoemulsification was performed with the US tip occluded. Temperature at the incision site was measured with a thermometer to determine whether a thermal burn occurred during the process. A hooked infusion cannula with a widened inner channel and 3 apertures was used to stabilize the anterior chamber depth.
RESULTS: Ultrasound phacoemulsification produced almost no temperature elevation at the incision site as long as the infusion liquid was adequately circulated around the US tip. With the 20 gauge US tip, an adequate volume of leakage was maintained through the 1.4 mm incision; no thermal burns developed at the incision site. The use of a hooked infusion cannula made it possible to stabilize the anterior chamber and to apply the bimanual nucleofractis technique to emulsify and aspirate the lens nucleus.
CONCLUSION: Using a sleeveless 20 gauge US tip, US cataract surgery was safely performed through a 1.4 mm incision without producing thermal burns at the incision site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11408144     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00822-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  13 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of coaxial phacoemulsification with 2.2- and 2.8-mm clear corneal incisions.

Authors:  Harinder Singh Sethi; Komal Saluja; Mayuresh P Naik
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of peristaltic and Venturi pumps in bimanual microincisional cataract surgery.

Authors:  Hande Karaguzel; Aylin Karalezli; Bekir Sitki Aslan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Bimanual microincisional cataract surgery technique and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Al-Muammar
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-05

Review 4.  [Incisions for biaxial and coaxial microincision cataract surgery].

Authors:  M Müller; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Technologies, techniques and tactics for micro-incision cataract surgery].

Authors:  E Fabian; M Maier
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Comparison of Phaconit Rollable IOL with Acrylic Foldable IOL.

Authors:  Jks Parihar; D P Vats; R P Gupta; T R Bera; R Phooken; A Singh
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

7.  Early changes in corneal edema following torsional phacoemulsification using anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug photography.

Authors:  Ying-Jun Li; Hyo-Jin Kim; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Investigation of scleral thermal injuries caused by ultrasonic pars plana phacoemulsification and aspiration using pig eyes.

Authors:  Takaki Sato; Toru Yasuhara; Masanori Fukumoto; Masashi Mimura; Takatoshi Kobayashi; Teruyo Kida; Shota Kojima; Hidehiro Oku; Tsunehiko Ikeda
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Patterns of crystallin distribution in porcine eye lenses.

Authors:  J Keenan; D F Orr; B K Pierscionek
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  Effect of biaxial versus coaxial microincision cataract surgery on optical quality of the cornea.

Authors:  Tamer Fahmy Eliwa; Mahmoud A Elsamkary; Ismail Hamza
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.