Literature DB >> 11406043

Spinal immobilisation for trauma patients.

I Kwan1, F Bunn, I Roberts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal immobilisation involves the use of a number of devices and strategies to stabilise the spinal column after injury and thus prevent spinal cord damage. The practice is widely recommended and widely used in trauma patients with suspected spinal cord injury in the pre-hospital setting.
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effect of different methods of spinal immobilisation (including immobilisation versus no immobilisation) on mortality, neurological disability, spinal stability and adverse effects in trauma patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (CCTR), the specialised register of the Cochrane Injuries Group, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and the National Research Register. We checked reference lists of all articles and contacted experts in the field to identify eligible trials. Manufacturers of spinal immobilisation devices were also contacted for information. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing spinal immobilisation strategies in trauma patients with suspected spinal cord injury. Trials in healthy volunteers were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria to trial reports and extracted data. MAIN
RESULTS: We found no randomised controlled trials of spinal immobilisation strategies in trauma patients. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. The effect of spinal immobilisation on mortality, neurological injury, spinal stability and adverse effects in trauma patients remains uncertain. Because airway obstruction is a major cause of preventable death in trauma patients, and spinal immobilisation, particularly of the cervical spine, can contribute to airway compromise, the possibility that immobilisation may increase mortality and morbidity cannot be excluded. Large prospective studies are needed to validate the decision criteria for spinal immobilisation in trauma patients with high risk of spinal injury. Randomised controlled trials in trauma patients are required to establish the relative effectiveness of alternative strategies for spinal immobilisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11406043      PMCID: PMC7003994          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  29 in total

Review 1.  Indications for prehospital spinal immobilization. National Association of EMS Physicians Standards and Clinical Practice Committee.

Authors:  R M Domeier
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization.

Authors:  V Y Totten; D B Sugarman
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group.

Authors:  J R Hoffman; W R Mower; A B Wolfson; K H Todd; M I Zucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Comparative study of risk factors for skin breakdown with cervical orthotic devices: Philadelphia and Aspen.

Authors:  C A Black; N M Buderer; B Blaylock; B J Hogan
Journal:  J Trauma Nurs       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.010

5.  China's first total care unit for the spinal cord injured.

Authors:  D Wang; X Wu; G Shi; Y Wang
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1990-06

6.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

Authors:  K F Schulz; I Chalmers; R J Hayes; D G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Skin necrosis caused by a semi-rigid cervical collar in a ventilated patient with multiple injuries.

Authors:  S Hewitt
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  The efficacy of head immobilization techniques during simulated vehicle motion.

Authors:  S D Perry; B McLellan; W E McIlroy; B E Maki; M Schwartz; G R Fernie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The effects of neutral positioning with and without padding on spinal immobilization of healthy subjects.

Authors:  E B Lerner; A J Billittier; R M Moscati
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  Backboard versus mattress splint immobilization: a comparison of symptoms generated.

Authors:  D Chan; R M Goldberg; J Mason; L Chan
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.484

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Prehospital care for road traffic casualties.

Authors:  T J Coats; G Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-11

Review 2.  Clinical review: Spinal imaging for the adult obtunded blunt trauma patient: update from 2004.

Authors:  James O M Plumb; C G Morris
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.

Authors:  Terje Sundstrøm; Helge Asbjørnsen; Samer Habiba; Geir Arne Sunde; Knut Wester
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  [Parameters influencing the preclinical application of cervical collars].

Authors:  M Kreinest; S Goller; G Rauch; B Gliwitzky; C Frank; S Matschke; C G Wölfl; M Münzberg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  Prehospital care of spinal injuries: a historical quest for reasoning and evidence.

Authors:  J G Ten Brinke; S R Groen; M Dehnad; T P Saltzherr; M Hogervorst; J C Goslings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Analysis of prehospital care and emergency room treatment of patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort study on the implementation of current guidelines.

Authors:  M Kreinest; L Ludes; A Türk; P A Grützner; B Biglari; S Matschke
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Semirigid cervical spine collar and risk of missing significant soft tissue injuries.

Authors:  Mohammed Hassan Hussain; Kenneth Corsar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-04-04

Review 8.  The ability of external immobilizers to restrict movement of the cervical spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Micha Holla; Joske M R Huisman; Nico Verdonschot; Jon Goosen; Allard J F Hosman; Gerjon Hannink
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Errors in cervical spine immobilization during pediatric trauma evaluation.

Authors:  Omar Z Ahmed; Rachel B Webman; Puja D Sheth; Jonah I Donnenfield; JaeWon Yang; Aleksandra Sarcevic; Ivan Marsic; Randall S Burd
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Why do we put cervical collars on conscious trauma patients?

Authors:  Jonathan Benger; Julian Blackham
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.