Literature DB >> 11403693

Daily variation and appetitive conditioning-induced plasticity of auditory cortex receptive fields.

M A Kisley1, G L Gerstein.   

Abstract

Long-term modification of cortical receptive field maps follows learning of sensory discriminations and conditioned associations. In the process of determining whether appetitive - as opposed to aversive - conditioning is effective in causing such plastic changes, it was discovered that multineuron receptive fields, when measured in rats under ketamine-sedation, vary substantially over the course of a week, even in the absence of classical conditioning and electrode movement. Specifically, a simple correlation analysis showed that iso-intensity frequency response curves of multiunit clusters and local field potentials recorded from auditory cortex are nonstationary over 7 days. Nevertheless, significant plastic changes in receptive fields, due to conditioned pairing of a pure tone and electrical stimulation of brain reward centres, are detectable above and beyond these spontaneous daily variations. This finding is based on a novel statistical plasticity criterion which compares receptive fields recorded for three days before and three days after conditioning. Based on a more traditional criterion (i.e. one day before and after conditioning), the prevalence of learning-induced changes caused by appetitive conditioning appears to be comparable to that described in previous studies involving aversive conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11403693     DOI: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01568.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  30 in total

Review 1.  The thalamo-cortical auditory receptive fields: regulation by the states of vigilance, learning and the neuromodulatory systems.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Single-unit responses in the auditory cortex of monkeys performing a conditional acousticomotor task.

Authors:  Caroline Durif; Christophe Jouffrais; Eric M Rouiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Suppression of cortical representation through backward conditioning.

Authors:  Shaowen Bao; Vincent T Chan; Li I Zhang; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Specific long-term memory traces in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Extinction reveals that primary sensory cortex predicts reinforcement outcome.

Authors:  Kasia M Bieszczad; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 6.  Associative representational plasticity in the auditory cortex: a synthesis of two disciplines.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 7.  Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1?

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Spectral and temporal processing in rat posterior auditory cortex.

Authors:  Pritesh K Pandya; Daniel L Rathbun; Raluca Moucha; Navzer D Engineer; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Auditory associative memory and representational plasticity in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Differential dynamic plasticity of A1 receptive fields during multiple spectral tasks.

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.