Literature DB >> 11403213

Are the salutogenic effects of social supports modified by income? A test of an "added value hypothesis".

P P Vitaliano1, J M Scanlan, J Zhang, M V Savage, B Brummett, J Barefoot, I C Siegler.   

Abstract

Older adults (54 men, 113 women; M age = 69.5 years) were examined to test the hypothesis that social supports would be more salutogenic (health promoting) for persons with lower incomes than for persons with higher incomes. Interactions of income and social supports (mean of 3 emotional scales of the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List) at study entry predicted changes 15-18 months later in a cardiovascular composite (linear combination of high-density lipoproteins-mean arterial pressure; p < .05), and natural killer cell activity (p < .05). For both outcomes, emotional supports were salutogenic for persons with lower incomes (< or =$29,000/year), but not for persons with higher incomes (>$29,000/year). In contrast, interactions of the Tangible Support Scale with income did not occur. Persons with lower incomes may derive benefits from social supports that go beyond tangible assistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11403213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  11 in total

1.  The association of social support and education with breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Patricia Documet; Todd M Bear; Jason D Flatt; Laura Macia; Jeanette Trauth; Edmund M Ricci
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2014-11-12

2.  Associations among social support, income, and symptoms of depression in an educated sample: the UNC Alumni Heart Study.

Authors:  Beverly H Brummett; John C Barefoot; Peter P Vitaliano; Ilene C Siegler
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2003

3.  Protective factors for adults from low-childhood socioeconomic circumstances: the benefits of shift-and-persist for allostatic load.

Authors:  Edith Chen; Gregory E Miller; Margie E Lachman; Tara L Gruenewald; Teresa E Seeman
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Social support and socioeconomic status interact to predict Epstein-Barr virus latency in women awaiting diagnosis or newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Fagundes; Jeanette M Bennett; Catherine M Alfano; Ronald Glaser; Stephen P Povoski; Adele M Lipari; Doreen M Agnese; Lisa D Yee; William E Carson; William B Farrar; William B Malarkey; Min Chen; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Promotores' perspectives on a male-to-male peer network.

Authors:  Laura Macia; Hector Camilo Ruiz; Roberto Boyzo; Patricia Isabel Documet
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2016-04-21

6.  The Women's Health Initiative: The food environment, neighborhood socioeconomic status, BMI, and blood pressure.

Authors:  Tamara Dubowitz; Madhumita Ghosh-Dastidar; Christine Eibner; Mary E Slaughter; Meenakshi Fernandes; Eric A Whitsel; Chloe E Bird; Adria Jewell; Karen L Margolis; Wenjun Li; Yvonne L Michael; Regina A Shih; Joann E Manson; José J Escarce
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  "Shift-and-Persist" Strategies: Why Low Socioeconomic Status Isn't Always Bad for Health.

Authors:  Edith Chen; Gregory E Miller
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-03

8.  Maternal warmth buffers the effects of low early-life socioeconomic status on pro-inflammatory signaling in adulthood.

Authors:  E Chen; G E Miller; M S Kobor; S W Cole
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 15.992

9.  Family/friend recommendations and mammography intentions: the roles of perceived mammography norms and support.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; India J Ornelas; Sarah L Doty; Sonia Bishop; Shirley A A Beresford; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2015-08-31

10.  How does social integration influence breast cancer control among urban African-American women? Results from a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Ann Carroll Klassen; Carmen Washington
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.