Literature DB >> 11401552

Charge translocation coupled to electron injection into oxidized cytochrome c oxidase from Paracoccus denitrificans.

M I Verkhovsky1, A Tuukkanen, C Backgren, A Puustinen, M Wikström.   

Abstract

Electrons were discretely injected into oxidized cytochrome c oxidase in liposomes by laser flash excitation of bound ruthenium [II] bispyridyl, and the membrane potential was recorded by time-resolved electrometry. Membrane potential is generated in a fast phase when an electron is transferred from the excited dye, via the CuA center, to heme a at a relative dielectric depth d inside the membrane [Zaslavsky, D., Kaulen, A. D., Smirnova, I. A., Vygodina, T., and Konstantinov, A. A. (1993) FEBS Lett. 336, 389-393]. Subsequently, membrane potential may develop further in a slower event, which is due to proton transfer into the enzyme from the opposite side of the membrane [Ruitenberg, M., Kannt, A., Bamberg, E., Ludwig, B., Michel, H., and Fendler, K. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 4632-4636]. Here, we confirm that injection of the first electron into the fully oxidized cytochrome c oxidase from Paracoccus denitrificans is associated with a fast electrogenic 11 micros phase, but there is no further electrogenic phase up to 100 milliseconds when special care is taken to ensure that only fully oxidized enzyme is present initially. A slower electrogenic 135 micros phase only becomes apparent and grows in amplitude upon increasing the number of light flashes. This occurs in parallel with a decrease in amplitude of the 11 micros phase and correlates with the number of enzyme molecules that are already reduced by one electron before the flash. The electrogenic 135 micros phase does not appear with increasing flash number in the K354M mutant enzyme, where electron and proton transfer into the binuclear center is delayed. We conclude that the 135 micros phase, and its associated proton uptake, take place on electron injection into enzyme molecules where the binuclear heme a3-CuB site is already reduced by one electron, and that it is accompanied by oxidation of heme a with a similar time constant. Reduction of heme a is not associated with electrogenic proton uptake into the enzyme, neither in the fully oxidized nor in the one-electron-reduced enzyme. The extent of the electrogenic 135 micrcos phase also rules out the possibility that reduction of the binuclear center by the second electron would be coupled to proton translocation in addition to the electrogenic uptake of a proton.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11401552     DOI: 10.1021/bi010030u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  15 in total

1.  The catalytic cycle of cytochrome c oxidase is not the sum of its two halves.

Authors:  Dmitry Bloch; Ilya Belevich; Audrius Jasaitis; Camilla Ribacka; Anne Puustinen; Michael I Verkhovsky; Mårten Wikström
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Net proton uptake is preceded by multiple proton transfer steps upon electron injection into cytochrome c oxidase.

Authors:  Kristina Kirchberg; Hartmut Michel; Ulrike Alexiev
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Initiation of the proton pump of cytochrome c oxidase.

Authors:  Ilya Belevich; Elena Gorbikova; Nikolai P Belevich; Virve Rauhamäki; Mårten Wikström; Michael I Verkhovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Control of respiration by cytochrome c oxidase in intact cells: role of the membrane potential.

Authors:  Maria Elena Dalmonte; Elena Forte; Maria Luisa Genova; Alessandro Giuffrè; Paolo Sarti; Giorgio Lenaz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Calculated proton uptake on anaerobic reduction of cytochrome C oxidase: is the reaction electroneutral?

Authors:  Yifan Song; Ekaterina Michonova-Alexova; M R Gunner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Partial steps of charge translocation in the nonpumping N139L mutant of Rhodobacter sphaeroides cytochrome c oxidase with a blocked D-channel.

Authors:  Sergey A Siletsky; Jiapeng Zhu; Robert B Gennis; Alexander A Konstantinov
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  The proton donor for O-O bond scission by cytochrome c oxidase.

Authors:  Elena A Gorbikova; Ilya Belevich; Mårten Wikström; Michael I Verkhovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  EPR evidence of cyanide binding to the Mn(Mg) center of cytochrome c oxidase: support for Cu(A)-Mg involvement in proton pumping.

Authors:  Martyn A Sharpe; Matthew D Krzyaniak; Shujuan Xu; John McCracken; Shelagh Ferguson-Miller
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Elevated proton leak of the intermediate OH in cytochrome c oxidase.

Authors:  Dmitry A Bloch; Audrius Jasaitis; Michael I Verkhovsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  Synthetic Fe/Cu Complexes: Toward Understanding Heme-Copper Oxidase Structure and Function.

Authors:  Suzanne M Adam; Gayan B Wijeratne; Patrick J Rogler; Daniel E Diaz; David A Quist; Jeffrey J Liu; Kenneth D Karlin
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.