Literature DB >> 11401198

Auditory frequency discrimination in the squirrel monkey.

A Wienicke1, U Häusler, U Jürgens.   

Abstract

Four squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) were tested for their frequency discrimination capacity using an eyeblink classical conditioning procedure, with air puff against the eye as unconditioned stimulus and 600-ms pure tones as conditioned stimuli. Absolute frequency difference thresholds showed a minimum (20-41 Hz, mean 30 Hz) at 4,000-8,000 Hz and increased towards higher as well as lower frequencies (70-90 Hz, mean 80 Hz at 300 Hz; 44-120 Hz, mean 82 Hz at 16,000 Hz). Relative frequency difference thresholds increased from higher to lower frequencies, with values as low as 0.3-0.8% (mean 0.5%) at 16,000 Hz and as large as 24-30% (mean 27%) at 300 Hz. The squirrel monkey's frequency discrimination function thus shows a severe deviation from Weber's law. The frequency difference thresholds are comparable to human's in the 4,000-8,000 Hz range, but are 65-80 times higher in the 500- to 300-Hz range. Individuals with high auditory thresholds do not necessarily also have high frequency difference thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11401198     DOI: 10.1007/s003590100189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  9 in total

1.  Complex pitch perception mechanisms are shared by humans and a New World monkey.

Authors:  Xindong Song; Michael S Osmanski; Yueqi Guo; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Somatic and neuroendocrine responses to standard and biologically salient acoustic startle stimuli in monkeys.

Authors:  Karen J Parker; Shellie A Hyde; Christine L Buckmaster; Serena M Tanaka; Katharine K Brewster; Alan F Schatzberg; David M Lyons; Steven H Woodward
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.905

3.  Measurement of absolute auditory thresholds in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michael S Osmanski; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Frequency discrimination in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michael S Osmanski; Xindong Song; Yueqi Guo; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Classical conditioned responses to absent tones.

Authors:  Marc Bangert; Uwe Jürgens; Udo Häusler; Eckart Altenmüller
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  Can squirrel monkeys learn an ABnA grammar? A re-evaluation of Ravignani et al. (2013).

Authors:  Stefano Ghirlanda
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Introducing the Software CASE (Cluster and Analyze Sound Events) by Comparing Different Clustering Methods and Audio Transformation Techniques Using Animal Vocalizations.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneider; Kurt Hammerschmidt; Paul Wilhelm Dierkes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 8.  The use of nonhuman primates in studies of noise injury and treatment.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Michelle D Valero; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Action at a distance: dependency sensitivity in a New World primate.

Authors:  Andrea Ravignani; Ruth-Sophie Sonnweber; Nina Stobbe; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.703

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.