Literature DB >> 27498400

Frequency discrimination in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Michael S Osmanski1, Xindong Song2, Yueqi Guo3, Xiaoqin Wang4.   

Abstract

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is a highly vocal New World primate species that has emerged in recent years as a promising model system for studies of auditory and vocal processing. Our recent studies have examined perceptual mechanisms related to the pitch of harmonic complex tones in this species. However, no previous psychoacoustic work has measured marmosets' frequency discrimination abilities for pure tones across a broad frequency range. Here we systematically examined frequency difference limens (FDLs), which measure the minimum discriminable frequency difference between two pure tones, in marmosets across most of their hearing range. Results show that marmosets' FDLs are comparable to other New World primates, with lowest values in the frequency range of ∼3.5-14 kHz. This region of lowest FDLs corresponds with the region of lowest hearing thresholds in this species measured in our previous study and also with the greatest concentration of spectral energy in the major types of marmoset vocalizations. These data suggest that frequency discrimination in the common marmoset may have evolved to match the hearing sensitivity and spectral characteristics of this species' vocalizations.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDL; Frequency discrimination; Hearing; Marmoset; Primate

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27498400      PMCID: PMC5295855          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  38 in total

1.  On cortical coding of vocal communication sounds in primates.

Authors:  X Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Individual recognition during bouts of antiphonal calling in common marmosets.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; A Wren Thomas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The sender-receiver matching hypothesis: support from the peripheral coding of acoustic features in songbirds.

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Lauren E Brierley; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Marmosets: A Neuroscientific Model of Human Social Behavior.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Winrich A Freiwald; David A Leopold; Jude F Mitchell; Afonso C Silva; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of auditory functions in the chimpanzee and human.

Authors:  S Kojima
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  A quantitative acoustic analysis of the vocal repertoire of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  James A Agamaite; Chia-Jung Chang; Michael S Osmanski; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Context and sex differences exist in the acoustic structure of phee calls by newly-paired common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  J L Norcross; J D Newman; L M Cofrancesco
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.371

9.  Vocal repertoire of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus), its analysis and significance.

Authors:  P Winter; D Ploog; J Latta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Sound emission and reception tuning in three cicada species sharing the same habitat.

Authors:  Jéro Me Sueur; James F C Windmill; Daniel Robert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Three psychophysical metrics of auditory temporal integration in macaques.

Authors:  Chase Mackey; Alejandro Tarabillo; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Nonadjacent dependency processing in monkeys, apes, and humans.

Authors:  Stuart K Watson; Judith M Burkart; Steven J Schapiro; Susan P Lambeth; Jutta L Mueller; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  Flexible auditory training, psychophysics, and enrichment of common marmosets with an automated, touchscreen-based system.

Authors:  A Calapai; J Cabrera-Moreno; T Moser; M Jeschke
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  High-resolution frequency tuning but not temporal coding in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Christian Desloovere; Philip X Joris
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Pupillometry as a reliable metric of auditory detection and discrimination across diverse stimulus paradigms in animal models.

Authors:  Pilar Montes-Lourido; Manaswini Kar; Isha Kumbam; Srivatsun Sadagopan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A silent two-photon imaging system for studying in vivo auditory neuronal functions.

Authors:  Xindong Song; Yueqi Guo; Chenggang Chen; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 20.257

Review 7.  The use of nonhuman primates in studies of noise injury and treatment.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Michelle D Valero; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.