Literature DB >> 11401079

The use of positive pressure devices by physiotherapists.

L Denehy1, S Berney.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to review the indications for use by physiotherapists, such as physiological rationale and the comparative efficacy of intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). A brief discussion of nasal intermittent positive airway pressure is also included. The use of IPPB for post operative prophylaxis has not been supported in the literature. In patients with low lung volumes resulting from neuromuscular disease or spinal injury, IPPB may be useful in the acute phase to improve tidal volume and cough effectiveness. The physiological benefits of CPAP to improve lung volumes are well documented in the literature. Physiotherapists use CPAP as an intermittent application in patients with low lung volumes following surgery. It is predominantly used as a second line intervention in the presence of refractory atelectasis and poor gas exchange. It may also be indicated in other patient groups with similar physiological problems. Nasal intermittent positive airway pressure combines the beneficial effects of intermittent positive pressure breathing and continuous positive airway pressure. There have been many studies evaluating its effectiveness. These have been supportive for patients with neuromuscular disease and sleep disordered breathing, but more research is needed in patients with acute respiratory failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11401079     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.01.17408210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  7 in total

1.  Summary of Consensus Report on Preoperative Evaluation.

Authors:  Metin Özkan; Gamze Kırkıl; Aslı Görek Dilektaşlı; Ayhan Söğüt; Bünyamin Sertoğullarından; Erdoğan Çetinkaya; Funda Coşkun; Gaye Ulubay; Hasan Yüksel; Murat Sezer; Ömer Özbudak; Sevinç Sarınç Ulaşlı; Sulhattin Arslan; Tezay Kovan
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2015-01-01

Review 2.  Prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy after cardiac surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Patrick Pasquina; Martin R Tramèr; Bernhard Walder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-13

Review 3.  Evidence regarding patient compliance with incentive spirometry interventions after cardiac, thoracic and abdominal surgeries: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Aqilah Leela T Narayanan; Syed Rasul G Syed Hamid; Eko Supriyanto
Journal:  Can J Respir Ther       Date:  2016

4.  Acute bag-valve breathing maneuvers plus manual chest compression is safe during stable septic shock: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Clarissa Netto Blattner; Rafael Saldanha Dos Santos; Fernando Suparregui Dias; Alexandre Simões Dias; Régis Gemerasca Mestriner; Silvia Regina Rios Vieira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  Guideline for the management of COVID-19 patients during hospital admission in a non-intensive care setting.

Authors:  Klaus Nielsen Jeschke; Barbara Bonnesen; Ejvind Frausing Hansen; Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen; Therese Sophie Lapperre; Ulla Møller Weinreich; Ole Hilberg
Journal:  Eur Clin Respir J       Date:  2020-05-28

6.  The effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on lung function and complications in cardiac surgery patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Meng-Fang Wu; Tsai-Yu Wang; Da-Shen Chen; Hsiu-Fong Hsiao; Han-Chuang Hu; Fu-Tsai Chung; Ting-Yu Lin; Shu-Min Lin
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 7.  Pulmonary Protection Strategies in Cardiac Surgery: Are We Making Any Progress?

Authors:  Emad Al Jaaly; Mustafa Zakkar; Francesca Fiorentino; Gianni D Angelini
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 6.543

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.