Literature DB >> 11399747

Environmental signaling: what embryos and evolution teach us about endocrine disrupting chemicals.

J A McLachlan1.   

Abstract

The term "endocrine disrupting chemicals" is commonly used to describe environmental agents that alter the endocrine system. Laboratories working in this emerging field-environmental endocrine research-have looked at chemicals that mimic or block endogenous vertebrate steroid hormones by interacting with the hormone's receptor. Environmental chemicals known to do this do so most often with receptors derived from the steroid/thyroid/retinoid gene family. They include ubiquitous and persistent organochlorines, as well as plasticizers, pharmaceuticals, and natural hormones. These chemicals function as estrogens, antiestrogens, and antiandrogens but have few, if any, structural similarities. Therefore, receptor-based or functional assays have the best chance of detecting putative biological activity of environmental chemicals. Three nuclear estrogen receptor forms-alpha, beta, and gamma-as well as multiple membrane forms and a possible mitochondrial form have been reported, suggesting a previously unknown diversity of signaling pathways available to estrogenic chemicals. Examples of environmental or ambient estrogenization occur in laboratory experiments, zoo animals, domestic animals, wildlife, and humans. Environmentally estrogenized phenotypes may differ depending upon the time of exposure-i.e., whether the exposure occurred at a developmental (organizational and irreversible) or postdevelopmental (activational and reversible) stage. The term "estrogen" must be defined in each case, since steroidal estrogens differ among themselves and from synthetic or plant-derived chemicals. An "estrogen-like function" seems to be an evolutionarily ancient signal that has been retained in a number of chemicals, some of which are vertebrate hormones. Signaling, required for symbiosis between plants and bacteria, may be viewed, therefore, as an early example of hormone cross-talk. Developmental feminization at the structural or functional level is an emerging theme in species exposed, during embryonic or fetal life, to estrogenic compounds. Human experience as well as studies in experimental animals with the potent estrogen diethylstilbestrol provide informative models. Advances in the molecular genetics of sex differentiation in vertebrates facilitate mechanistic understanding. Experiments addressing the concept of gene imprinting or induction of epigenetic memory by estrogen or other hormones suggest a link to persistent, heritable phenotypic changes seen after developmental estrogenization, independent of mutagenesis. Environmental endocrine science provides a new context in which to examine the informational content of ecosystem-wide communication networks. As common features come to light, this research may allow us to predict environmentally induced alterations in internal signaling systems of vertebrates and some invertebrates and eventually to explicate environmental contributions to human reproductive and developmental health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11399747     DOI: 10.1210/edrv.22.3.0432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Rev        ISSN: 0163-769X            Impact factor:   19.871


  102 in total

1.  Molecular cloning, characterization, and chromosome mapping of reptilian estrogen receptors.

Authors:  Yoshinao Katsu; Kazumi Matsubara; Satomi Kohno; Yoichi Matsuda; Michihisa Toriba; Kaori Oka; Louis J Guillette; Yasuhiko Ohta; Taisen Iguchi
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  Endocrine disrupting chemicals: Multiple effects on testicular signaling and spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Bonnie Hy Yeung; Hin T Wan; Alice Ys Law; Chris Kc Wong
Journal:  Spermatogenesis       Date:  2011-07-01

Review 3.  Disentangling the molecular mechanisms of action of endogenous and environmental estrogens.

Authors:  Angel Nadal; Paloma Alonso-Magdalena; Cristina Ripoll; Esther Fuentes
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 4.  Hormone replacement therapy, cancer, controversies, and women's health: historical, epidemiological, biological, clinical, and advocacy perspectives.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Ilana Löwy; Robert Aronowitz; Judyann Bigby; Kay Dickersin; Elizabeth Garner; Jean-Paul Gaudillière; Carolina Hinestrosa; Ruth Hubbard; Paula A Johnson; Stacey A Missmer; Judy Norsigian; Cynthia Pearson; Charles E Rosenberg; Lynn Rosenberg; Barbara G Rosenkrantz; Barbara Seaman; Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto; Joe Thornton; George Weisz
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Developmental estrogen exposures predispose to prostate carcinogenesis with aging.

Authors:  Gail S Prins; Lynn Birch; Wan-Yee Tang; Shuk-Mei Ho
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  Transgenerational epigenetic imprints on mate preference.

Authors:  David Crews; Andrea C Gore; Timothy S Hsu; Nygerma L Dangleben; Michael Spinetta; Timothy Schallert; Matthew D Anway; Michael K Skinner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Bisphenol A in artificial indoor streams: II. Stress response and gonad histology in Gammarus fossarum (Amphipoda).

Authors:  Martin Schirling; Dirk Jungmann; Vanessa Ladewig; Kai-Uwe Ludwichowski; Roland Nagel; Heinz-R Köhler; Rita Triebskorn
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 8.  The role of estrogens and estrogen receptors in normal prostate growth and disease.

Authors:  Gail S Prins; Kenneth S Korach
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 9.  Isoflavones and skeletal health: are these molecules ready for clinical application?

Authors:  S Migliaccio; J J B Anderson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  An aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor from Xenopus laevis: function, expression, and role in dioxin responsiveness during frog development.

Authors:  Anna L Zimmermann; Elizabeth A King; Emelyne Dengler; Shana R Scogin; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.