C Lemière1, S Chaboillez, J L Malo, A Cartier. 1. Department of Chest Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur, 5400 West Gouin, Montreal, Québec, Canada H4J 1C5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to occupational agents can induce eosinophilic inflammation in subjects with occupational asthma (OA). It might also induce nonspecific changes in airway inflammation in subjects without OA. OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the changes in airway inflammation induced by exposure to occupational agents in subjects with and without OA and to determine which changes in sputum eosinophil numbers and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine should be regarded as clinically significant for predicting a 20% fall in FEV(1). METHODS: We performed specific inhalation challenges (SICs) in 3 groups of subjects: subjects reporting a history consistent with OA with a positive SIC response (n = 17); subjects reporting a history consistent with OA with a negative SIC response (n = 14); and asthmatic subjects without any history of OA (n = 10). Induced sputum and methacholine challenges were performed at the end of the control day and again at the end of the last day of exposure; the last day of exposure was always performed in the laboratory. RESULTS: There was an increase in median sputum eosinophil and neutrophil numbers in subjects with positive SIC responses. Cell counts remained unchanged after exposure in asthmatic subjects without OA. A combination of a greater than 0.26 10(6)/mL increase in sputum eosinophil numbers and a decrease in the concentration of methacholine inducing a 20% fall in FEV(1) of at least 1.8-fold compared with baseline values predicted a 20% fall in FEV(1) in 96% (95% CI, 70%-99%) of patients. CONCLUSION: Exposure to occupational agents per se does not induce airway inflammation. Changes in both sputum eosinophil counts and methacholine responsiveness are satisfactory predictors of a significant bronchial responsiveness to occupational agents.
BACKGROUND: Exposure to occupational agents can induce eosinophilic inflammation in subjects with occupational asthma (OA). It might also induce nonspecific changes in airway inflammation in subjects without OA. OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the changes in airway inflammation induced by exposure to occupational agents in subjects with and without OA and to determine which changes in sputum eosinophil numbers and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine should be regarded as clinically significant for predicting a 20% fall in FEV(1). METHODS: We performed specific inhalation challenges (SICs) in 3 groups of subjects: subjects reporting a history consistent with OA with a positive SIC response (n = 17); subjects reporting a history consistent with OA with a negative SIC response (n = 14); and asthmatic subjects without any history of OA (n = 10). Induced sputum and methacholine challenges were performed at the end of the control day and again at the end of the last day of exposure; the last day of exposure was always performed in the laboratory. RESULTS: There was an increase in median sputum eosinophil and neutrophil numbers in subjects with positive SIC responses. Cell counts remained unchanged after exposure in asthmatic subjects without OA. A combination of a greater than 0.26 10(6)/mL increase in sputum eosinophil numbers and a decrease in the concentration of methacholine inducing a 20% fall in FEV(1) of at least 1.8-fold compared with baseline values predicted a 20% fall in FEV(1) in 96% (95% CI, 70%-99%) of patients. CONCLUSION: Exposure to occupational agents per se does not induce airway inflammation. Changes in both sputum eosinophil counts and methacholine responsiveness are satisfactory predictors of a significant bronchial responsiveness to occupational agents.
Authors: Elizabeth M Fireman; Yehuda Lerman; Eliezer Ganor; Joel Greif; Sharon Fireman-Shoresh; Paul J Lioy; Gisela I Banauch; Michael Weiden; Kerry J Kelly; David J Prezant Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Tor B Aasen; P Sherwood Burge; Paul K Henneberger; Vivi Schlünssen; Xaver Baur Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 2.646