OBJECTIVES: To measure plasma levels and pharmacokinetics of cefpirome in critically ill septic patients with normal renal function. To use the pharmacokinetic model to simulate alternate dosing regimens and identify those that predict sustained levels. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, open-label, descriptive study in a 22-bed, multidisciplinary, adult ICU in a university-affiliated, tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve adults with normal renal function on enrollment and with suspected or documented sepsis in whom cefpirome was judged to be the appropriate therapy by the managing clinician. INTERVENTIONS: Cefpirome 2 g was infused intravenously over 3 min every 12 h. Timed blood samples were taken prior to and during two dosing intervals. Urine was collected for creatinine clearance determination. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Two patients were non-evaluable due to renal dysfunction post-enrollment. The median cefpirome trough level was 1.1 mg/l (range 0.5-8.1 mg/l) after the initial dose and 1.4 mg/l (range < 0.5-15.9 mg/l) at 'steady state'. The volumes of distribution and elimination half-lives were greater and more variable than in healthy volunteers. Pharmacokinetic simulation predicted that more frequent bolus dosing, increased doses and continuous infusions would result in concentrations greater than 4 mg/l for over 60% of the dosing interval for all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cefpirome 2 g twice daily produced low plasma troughs in a number of patients. Our data suggest that this drug regimen may be inadequate for successful treatment of difficult-to-treat infections in critically ill patients with normal renal function.
OBJECTIVES: To measure plasma levels and pharmacokinetics of cefpirome in critically ill septicpatients with normal renal function. To use the pharmacokinetic model to simulate alternate dosing regimens and identify those that predict sustained levels. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, open-label, descriptive study in a 22-bed, multidisciplinary, adult ICU in a university-affiliated, tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve adults with normal renal function on enrollment and with suspected or documented sepsis in whom cefpirome was judged to be the appropriate therapy by the managing clinician. INTERVENTIONS:Cefpirome 2 g was infused intravenously over 3 min every 12 h. Timed blood samples were taken prior to and during two dosing intervals. Urine was collected for creatinine clearance determination. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Two patients were non-evaluable due to renal dysfunction post-enrollment. The median cefpirome trough level was 1.1 mg/l (range 0.5-8.1 mg/l) after the initial dose and 1.4 mg/l (range < 0.5-15.9 mg/l) at 'steady state'. The volumes of distribution and elimination half-lives were greater and more variable than in healthy volunteers. Pharmacokinetic simulation predicted that more frequent bolus dosing, increased doses and continuous infusions would result in concentrations greater than 4 mg/l for over 60% of the dosing interval for all patients. CONCLUSIONS:Cefpirome 2 g twice daily produced low plasma troughs in a number of patients. Our data suggest that this drug regimen may be inadequate for successful treatment of difficult-to-treat infections in critically illpatients with normal renal function.
Authors: Alexandra Douglas; Andrew A Udy; Steven C Wallis; Paul Jarrett; Janine Stuart; Melissa Lassig-Smith; Renae Deans; Michael S Roberts; Kersi Taraporewalla; Jason Jenkins; Gregory Medley; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jin Wi; Min Jung Chang; Soyoung Kang; June Young Jang; Jongsung Hahn; Dasohm Kim; Jun Yeong Lee; Kyoung Lok Min; Seungwon Yang Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Christian Radke; Dagmar Horn; Christian Lanckohr; Björn Ellger; Michaela Meyer; Thomas Eissing; Georg Hempel Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Robert Sauermann; Georg Delle-Karth; Claudia Marsik; Ilka Steiner; Markus Zeitlinger; Bernhard X Mayer-Helm; Apostolos Georgopoulos; Markus Müller; Christian Joukhadar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.191