M van der Laan1, N M Bax, D C van der Zee, B M Ure. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, P.O. Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some authors have argued that intussusception is best treated via a laparoscopic approach. As we did not have this impression, we reviewed our experience with this condition. METHODS: : We reviewed all patients with intussusception who were treated at our hospital over the past 10 years. The choice of whether to use a laparoscopic or open approach depended on the patient's clinical condition and the availability of surgeons with laparoscopic expertise. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were identified. Based on age, two subgroups were distinguished-one comprised of patients under the age of 3 years and one of patients over the age of 3 years. Sixty-five patients were under 3 years of age. Thirty-five had surgery, and 19 required resection. Of the 10 patients who were treated with a laparoscopic approach, only three could be reduced laparoscopically. After conversion in the other seven patients, the intussusception was reduced in five whereas a resection was required in two cases. Seven patients were 3 years of age or older. All of them underwent surgery, and all but one required resection. All four children who were laparoscoped subsequently had a bowel resection at open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients 3 years of age or older usually need resection and will not benefit from the laparoscopic approach. Under 3 years of age, little is to be gained from a laparoscopic approach, provided good nonsurgical reduction facilities are available. There is a place for the laparoscopic approach in cases of recurrent intussusception or doubtful reduction.
BACKGROUND: Some authors have argued that intussusception is best treated via a laparoscopic approach. As we did not have this impression, we reviewed our experience with this condition. METHODS: : We reviewed all patients with intussusception who were treated at our hospital over the past 10 years. The choice of whether to use a laparoscopic or open approach depended on the patient's clinical condition and the availability of surgeons with laparoscopic expertise. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were identified. Based on age, two subgroups were distinguished-one comprised of patients under the age of 3 years and one of patients over the age of 3 years. Sixty-five patients were under 3 years of age. Thirty-five had surgery, and 19 required resection. Of the 10 patients who were treated with a laparoscopic approach, only three could be reduced laparoscopically. After conversion in the other seven patients, the intussusception was reduced in five whereas a resection was required in two cases. Seven patients were 3 years of age or older. All of them underwent surgery, and all but one required resection. All four children who were laparoscoped subsequently had a bowel resection at open surgery. CONCLUSIONS:Patients 3 years of age or older usually need resection and will not benefit from the laparoscopic approach. Under 3 years of age, little is to be gained from a laparoscopic approach, provided good nonsurgical reduction facilities are available. There is a place for the laparoscopic approach in cases of recurrent intussusception or doubtful reduction.
Authors: Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; L Grier Arthur; Regan F Williams; Adam B Goldin; Shawn D St Peter; Alana L Beres; Yue-Yung Hu; Elizabeth J Renaud; Robert Ricca; Mark B Slidell; Amy Taylor; Caitlin A Smith; Doug Miniati; Juan E Sola; Patricia Valusek; Loren Berman; Mehul V Raval; Ankush Gosain; Matthew B Dellinger; Stig Sømme; Cynthia D Downard; Jarod P McAteer; Akemi Kawaguchi Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: E A te Velde; N M A Bax; S H A J Tytgat; J R de Jong; D Vieira Travassos; W L M Kramer; D C van der Zee Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2007-05-05 Impact factor: 4.584