Literature DB >> 11395407

Divergent evolution of enzymatic function: mechanistically diverse superfamilies and functionally distinct suprafamilies.

J A Gerlt1, P C Babbitt.   

Abstract

The protein sequence and structure databases are now sufficiently representative that strategies nature uses to evolve new catalytic functions can be identified. Groups of divergently related enzymes whose members catalyze different reactions but share a common partial reaction, intermediate, or transition state (mechanistically diverse superfamilies) have been discovered, including the enolase, amidohydrolase, thiyl radical, crotonase, vicinal-oxygen-chelate, and Fe-dependent oxidase superfamilies. Other groups of divergently related enzymes whose members catalyze different overall reactions that do not share a common mechanistic strategy (functionally distinct suprafamilies) have also been identified: (a) functionally distinct suprafamilies whose members catalyze successive transformations in the tryptophan and histidine biosynthetic pathways and (b) functionally distinct suprafamilies whose members catalyze different reactions in different metabolic pathways. An understanding of the structural bases for the catalytic diversity observed in super- and suprafamilies may provide the basis for discovering the functions of proteins and enzymes in new genomes as well as provide guidance for in vitro evolution/engineering of new enzymes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11395407     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem        ISSN: 0066-4154            Impact factor:   23.643


  170 in total

1.  Utilization of L-ascorbate by Escherichia coli K-12: assignments of functions to products of the yjf-sga and yia-sgb operons.

Authors:  Wen Shan Yew; John A Gerlt
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Structural analysis of two enzymes catalysing reverse metabolic reactions implies common ancestry.

Authors:  Olga Mayans; Andreas Ivens; L Johan Nissen; Kasper Kirschner; Matthias Wilmanns
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The Structure Superposition Database.

Authors:  Ranyee A Chiang; Elaine C Meng; Conrad C Huang; Thomas E Ferrin; Patricia C Babbitt
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Many paths to methyltransfer: a chronicle of convergence.

Authors:  Heidi L Schubert; Robert M Blumenthal; Xiaodong Cheng
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.807

5.  Displacements of prohead protease genes in the late operons of double-stranded-DNA bacteriophages.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Arcady Mushegian
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Trends between gene content and genome size in prokaryotic species with larger genomes.

Authors:  Konstantinos T Konstantinidis; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Compound library development guided by protein structure similarity clustering and natural product structure.

Authors:  Marcus A Koch; Lars-Oliver Wittenberg; Sudipta Basu; Duraiswamy A Jeyaraj; Eleni Gourzoulidou; Kerstin Reinecke; Alex Odermatt; Herbert Waldmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Enzyme (re)design: lessons from natural evolution and computation.

Authors:  John A Gerlt; Patricia C Babbitt
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Reflections on the catalytic power of a TIM-barrel.

Authors:  John P Richard; Xiang Zhai; M Merced Malabanan
Journal:  Bioorg Chem       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.275

Review 10.  Specificity in transition state binding: the Pauling model revisited.

Authors:  Tina L Amyes; John P Richard
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.