Literature DB >> 11394589

Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: a validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment.

M J Scherer1, L A Cushman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Assesses the validity of a subset of items of the Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment (ATD PA) as a measure of quality of life (QOL) for persons with new spinal cord injury.
METHOD: Subjects completed the ATD PA QOL subset, Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) while in acute rehabilitation. The internal reliability of the QOL subset of the ATD PA was assessed. Concurrent validity of the ATD PA's QOL subset with the SWLS and construct validity with the BSI depression subscale was assessed using Spearman correlations. Subjects were recruited while acute rehabilitation inpatients in a general hospital and consisted of twenty persons with newly acquired SCI (10 males and 10 females).
RESULTS: Significant positive correlations between the ATD PA's QOL subset and SWLS (and significant negative correlations with the BSI depression subscale) suggest the QOL subset has concurrent and construct validity.
CONCLUSIONS: The ATD PA's QOL subset appears to be a valid measure and, thus, it can be useful both in identifying subjective quality of life and predispositions to AT use early in rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11394589     DOI: 10.1080/09638280010006665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  15 in total

1.  A quality-of-life scale for assistive technology: results of a pilot study of aging and technology.

Authors:  Emily M Agree; Vicki A Freedman
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-10-14

2.  Perceptions of power mobility use and safety within residential facilities.

Authors:  William B Mortenson; William C Miller; Jeanette Boily; Barbara Steele; Leslie Odell; Erin M Crawford; Guylaine Desharnais
Journal:  Can J Occup Ther       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.614

3.  Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: development of the wheelchair outcome measure.

Authors:  William B Mortenson; William C Miller; Jan Miller-Pogar
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2007-09

4.  One-year follow-up of Chinese people with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Sam Chi Chung Chan; Alice Po Shan Chan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Data logger technologies for manual wheelchairs: A scoping review.

Authors:  François Routhier; Josiane Lettre; William C Miller; Jaimie F Borisoff; Kate Keetch; Ian M Mitchell; CanWheel Research Team
Journal:  Assist Technol       Date:  2017-01-04

6.  Comparison of virtual wheelchair driving performance of people with traumatic brain injury using an isometric and a conventional joystick.

Authors:  Harshal Mahajan; Donald M Spaeth; Brad E Dicianno; Diane M Collins; Michael L Boninger; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Life satisfaction and quality of life of older New Zealanders with and without impaired vision: a descriptive, comparative study.

Authors:  Gretchen Ann Good
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2008-08-21

Review 8.  Research in computer access assessment and intervention.

Authors:  Richard Simpson; Heidi Horstmann Koester; Edmund Lopresti
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.784

9.  Comfort and stability of wheelchair backrests according to the TAWC (tool for assessing wheelchair discomfort).

Authors:  Eun-Kyoung Hong; Brad E Dicianno; Jon Pearlman; Rosemarie Cooper; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2014-07-18

Review 10.  Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Valéria Baldassin; Helena Eri Shimizu; Emerson Fachin-Martins
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.