Literature DB >> 11394028

Manometric assessment of anorectal function.

W M Sun1, S S Rao.   

Abstract

A diagnostic test is useful if it can provide information regarding the underlying pathophysiology, confirm a clinical suspicion, or guide clinical management. In a prospective study, anorectal manometry was shown not only to confirm a clinical impression, but also to provide new information that was not detected clinically. The information obtained from these studies influenced the management and outcome of patients with defecation disorders (Table 1). These findings have been confirmed further by another study that showed colorectal physiologic tests provided a definitive diagnosis in 75% of patients with constipation, 66% of patients with incontinence, and 42% of patients with intractable anorectal pain. A systematic and careful appraisal of anorectal function can provide invaluable information that can guide treatment of patients with anorectal disorders. A more uniform method of performing these tests and interpreting the results is needed to facilitate a wider use of this technology for the assessment of patients with anorectal disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11394028     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8553(05)70165-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8553            Impact factor:   3.806


  13 in total

Review 1.  Methods of Evaluation of Anorectal Causes of Obstructed Defecation.

Authors:  Anne C Fabrizio; Yewande Alimi; Anjali S Kumar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 2.  Physical examination of the female cancer patient with sexual concerns: What oncologists and patients should expect from consultation with a specialist.

Authors:  Stacy Tessler Lindau; Emily M Abramsohn; Shirley R Baron; Judith Florendo; Hope K Haefner; Anuja Jhingran; Vanessa Kennedy; Mukta K Krane; David M Kushner; Jennifer McComb; Diane F Merritt; Julie E Park; Amy Siston; Margaret Straub; Lauren Streicher
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 3.  What is necessary to diagnose constipation?

Authors:  Satish S C Rao; Kalyani Meduri
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.043

4.  Consensus statement AIGO/SICCR: diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation (part I: diagnosis).

Authors:  Antonio Bove; Filippo Pucciani; Massimo Bellini; Edda Battaglia; Renato Bocchini; Donato Francesco Altomare; Giuseppe Dodi; Guido Sciaudone; Ezio Falletto; Vittorio Piloni; Dario Gambaccini; Vincenzo Bove
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  UEG Week 2020 Oral Presentations.

Authors: 
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  The evaluation of constipation.

Authors:  Matthew D Vrees; Eric G Weiss
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-05

7.  Evaluation of anal incontinence: minimal approach, maximal effectiveness.

Authors:  Harry T Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

8.  How to interpret conventional anorectal manometry.

Authors:  Jie-Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 9.  Gastrointestinal dysfunction in the synucleinopathies.

Authors:  Kathryn A Chung; Ronald F Pfeiffer
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 10.  Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Ronald F Pfeiffer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.