Literature DB >> 11393614

Blur tolerance for luminance and chromatic stimuli.

S M Wuerger1, H Owens, S Westland.   

Abstract

We investigated the blur tolerance of human observers for stimuli modulated along the isoluminant red-green, the isoluminant yellow-blue, and the luminance (black-white) direction in color space. We report the following results: (i) Blur difference thresholds for red-green and luminance stimuli (of equal cone contrast) are very similar and as low as 0.5 min of visual angle; for yellow-blue the lowest blur thresholds are much higher (1.5 min of visual angle). (ii) The smallest blur thresholds are found for slightly blurred square waves (reference blur of 1 arc min) and not for sharp edges. (iii) Blur thresholds for red-green and black-white follow a Weber law for reference (pedestal) blurs greater than the optimum blur. (iv) Using the model proposed by Watt and Morgan [Vision Res. 24, 1387 (1984)] we estimated the internal blur of the visual system for the black-white and the red-green color directions and arrived at the following estimates: 1.2 arc min for black-white stimuli at 10% contrast and 0.9 arc min for red-green stimuli at 10% cone contrast. Blur tolerance for yellow-blue is independent of external blur and cannot be predicted by the model. (v) The contrast dependence of blur sensitivity is similar for red-green and luminance modulations (slopes of -0.15 and -0.16 in log-log coordinates, respectively) and slightly stronger for yellow-blue (slope = -0.75). Blur discrimination thresholds are not predicted by the contrast sensitivity function of the visual system. Our findings are useful for predicting blur tolerance for complex images and provide a spatial frequency cutoff point when Gaussian low-pass filters are used for noise removal in colored images. They are also useful as a baseline for the study of visual disorders such as amblyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11393614     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.18.001231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  6 in total

1.  Visual discomfort and natural image statistics.

Authors:  Igor Juricevic; Leah Land; Arnold Wilkins; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Response normalization and blur adaptation: data and multi-scale model.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Mark A Georgeson; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Perceived blur in naturally contoured images depends on phase.

Authors:  Stephanie Murray; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-02

4.  Spatio-chromatic contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic light levels.

Authors:  Sophie Wuerger; Maliha Ashraf; Minjung Kim; Jasna Martinovic; María Pérez-Ortiz; Rafal K Mantiuk
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Blur Representation in the Amblyopic Visual System Using Natural and Synthetic Images.

Authors:  Reza Abbas Farishta; Charlene L Yang; Reza Farivar
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Effects of glaucoma on detection and discrimination of image blur.

Authors:  Habiba A Bham; Jonathan Denniss
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.992

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.