R A Wiklund1, H D Stein, S H Rosenbaum. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Algorithms for preoperative cardiac evaluation prior to noncardiac surgery use indices of the metabolic equivalent of activities of daily living (METs). We evaluated METs as a predictor of cardiac complications following elective, noncardiac surgery. METHODS: A study was performed in an outpatient university preadmission center METs were estimated prospectively for 5,939 inpatients admitted for elective, noncardiac surgery who underwent a preanesthetic assessment within two months prior to surgery. Cardiac outcomes were retrieved retrospectively from relational databases. Outcomes included death, myocardial infarction, acute congestive failure, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, acute ischemia, acute renalfailure, stroke, respiratory failure, severe hypertension, peripheral vascular occlusion, and pericardial effusion. Adverse outcomes were correlated with age, gender, surgical procedure, activities, and the American Society of Anesthesiologist's Physical Status (ASA-PS) using receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: 94 of 5,939 (1.6 percent) patients had cardiac complications; 16 died, six from their cardiac complication. 38.3 percent of complications occurred following vascular surgery. Using a multinomial logistic regression analysis, both age and physical status were highly significant predictors (p < 0.001) but METs was not (p = 0. 793). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were usedfor predictive value of variables. Area of the curves for age versus cardiac complications and death were 0.814 and 0.782; for physical status, 0.744 and 0.803; for METs, 0.664 and 0.524. CONCLUSIONS: METs are not a reliable index for the prediction of adverse cardiac events following elective, noncardiac surgery. Age and physical status are more predictive. Adverse cardiac outcomes are most frequent following vascular surgery.
BACKGROUND: Algorithms for preoperative cardiac evaluation prior to noncardiac surgery use indices of the metabolic equivalent of activities of daily living (METs). We evaluated METs as a predictor of cardiac complications following elective, noncardiac surgery. METHODS: A study was performed in an outpatient university preadmission center METs were estimated prospectively for 5,939 inpatients admitted for elective, noncardiac surgery who underwent a preanesthetic assessment within two months prior to surgery. Cardiac outcomes were retrieved retrospectively from relational databases. Outcomes included death, myocardial infarction, acute congestive failure, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, acute ischemia, acute renalfailure, stroke, respiratory failure, severe hypertension, peripheral vascular occlusion, and pericardial effusion. Adverse outcomes were correlated with age, gender, surgical procedure, activities, and the American Society of Anesthesiologist's Physical Status (ASA-PS) using receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: 94 of 5,939 (1.6 percent) patients had cardiac complications; 16 died, six from their cardiac complication. 38.3 percent of complications occurred following vascular surgery. Using a multinomial logistic regression analysis, both age and physical status were highly significant predictors (p < 0.001) but METs was not (p = 0. 793). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were usedfor predictive value of variables. Area of the curves for age versus cardiac complications and death were 0.814 and 0.782; for physical status, 0.744 and 0.803; for METs, 0.664 and 0.524. CONCLUSIONS: METs are not a reliable index for the prediction of adverse cardiac events following elective, noncardiac surgery. Age and physical status are more predictive. Adverse cardiac outcomes are most frequent following vascular surgery.
Authors: T H Lee; E R Marcantonio; C M Mangione; E J Thomas; C A Polanczyk; E F Cook; D J Sugarbaker; M C Donaldson; R Poss; K K Ho; L E Ludwig; A Pedan; L Goldman Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-09-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: L Goldman; D L Caldera; S R Nussbaum; F S Southwick; D Krogstad; B Murray; D S Burke; T A O'Malley; A H Goroll; C H Caplan; J Nolan; B Carabello; E E Slater Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1977-10-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M G Hunink; L Goldman; A N Tosteson; M A Mittleman; P A Goldman; L W Williams; J Tsevat; M C Weinstein Journal: JAMA Date: 1997-02-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M A Hlatky; R E Boineau; M B Higginbotham; K L Lee; D B Mark; R M Califf; F R Cobb; D B Pryor Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1989-09-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: A S Detsky; H B Abrams; J R McLaughlin; D J Drucker; Z Sasson; N Johnston; J G Scott; N Forbath; J R Hilliard Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 1986 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: N H Carliner; M L Fisher; G D Plotnick; H Garbart; A Rapoport; M H Kelemen; G W Moran; T Gadacz; R W Peters Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1985-07-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Gabriela Sousa; Ana Lopes; Pedro Reis; Vasco Carvalho; Alice Santos; Fernando José Abelha Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Duminda N Wijeysundera; Rupert M Pearse; Mark A Shulman; Tom E F Abbott; Elizabeth Torres; Bernard L Croal; John T Granton; Kevin E Thorpe; Michael P W Grocott; Catherine Farrington; Paul S Myles; Brian H Cuthbertson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 2.692